Some people think music plays an important role in society. Others think it is it is simply a form of entertainment. Discuss both sides and opinion.
In every stage of society, the importance level of music in life is always a controversial topic. Whilst there is a school of thought that holds that such melody compositions are merely a tool of amusement, other people and I assume that this kind of art contributes greatly to society. The reasons of both sides will be elaborated on in this essay.
To commence with, there would be two main rationales for the perception that music primarily serves as a form of entertainment. First and foremost, music is seen as a commodity that caters to individual preferences and tastes, meaning that it is mainly consumed for personal pleasure rather than for its societal impact or cultural significance. Many people listen to music just to relax after a hard working day or escape from their stress without any thought about societal influences. Secondly, some songs in modern society are assumed to be a temporary recreation because of how they are created. In fact, in the context of the competitive music industry, many musicians compose songs quickly just to catch current trends among the young generation and then let such works sink into obscurity.
Nevertheless, I would contend that music brings to society abundant benefits, especially, in terms of cultural significance and economics. Regarding the former, music is deeply intertwined with the cultural fabric of societies around the world, reflecting their traditions, beliefs, and values. Traditional music genres and songs are passed down through generations, thus acting as a link to the past and providing insights into the social, religious, and historical contexts of a community. In terms of economic effects, companies in the music industry are generating billions of dollars in revenue each year thanks to the sales of albums, tickets to live shows, and contracts with advertising agencies. In Korea, for instance, music companies have contributed more than $15 billion to the nation’s GDP yearly, highlighting the country’s economic success in recent decades.
In conclusion, both sides of the argument have their own merits. However, I consider the influence of music on national culture and economic development to be remarkable even though it might just be a stress reliever for some people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-23 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-23 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-12 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
- The best way for a country to prepare for the future is to invest more resources in the young people Do you agree or disagree 89
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g dinosaurs dodos etc There is no reason why people should stop this from happening Do you agree or disagree 73
- Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled by governments rather than private companies To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- In some countries people are having children at a later age in life What are the reasons Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages 89
- In many countries children are becoming overweight and unhealthy Some people think that the government should have the responsibility To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... economic success in recent decades. In conclusion, both sides of the argument ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, nevertheless, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, thus, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1919.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37535014006 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12767896297 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610644257703 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.590076719 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.933333333 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155939874374 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052916589226 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0224431633626 0.0667982634062 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0941939110729 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.015353490351 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.13 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... economic success in recent decades. In conclusion, both sides of the argument ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, nevertheless, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, thus, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1919.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37535014006 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12767896297 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610644257703 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.590076719 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.933333333 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155939874374 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052916589226 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0224431633626 0.0667982634062 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0941939110729 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.015353490351 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.13 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.