Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of old houses in local areas. Others think that people should have freedom to build houses of their own style. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
It is argued that newly constructed houses are advised to follow the style of ancient houses in local areas, different city-dweller would like to build houses of their own style. While constructing houses following the style of old ones can boost the value of local culture, building houses according to the owner’s style allow them to feel comfortable or convenient. I fully concur with the second position.
To begin with, it has been widely demonstrated that the style of design of houses should follow the local architecture owing to relation to the value of ancient culture. In reality, it is undoubted that the aspects of cultural value play crucial in appealing to visitors, and foreigners. Furthermore, it is obvious that attracting tourists can have a positive effect on the local, which can create occupation opportunities to the unemployed. Building an ancient houses leads to new view to visitors who can comprehend the local culture after finishing traveling. For instance, on behalf of the reporter, I seized an opportunity to ask a foreigner named Sam that how do you think about old archetecture? And I may not come as a surprise that he said that I am pretty keen on being here because of the ancient houses.
Despite good arguments, I think that building a house following the preference of the owner’s style is better than forcing to the construction of old house style in local areas, which is because the houses of style that owner preferring make them comfortable or convenient. Given the fact that in modern society, people have a lot of options to build a house, it is possible to construct a cutting-edge house with high-priced equipment, and furniture, resulting in convenience. Moreover, an enormous house can make people more pay attention than an old house today. But it is most important that design according to before assigned architecture of owner can help them being proud as well as stir their interest after getting out of work pressure.
In conclusion, based on the mentioned arguments above, from my perspective, building a house following the preferred style of owner is more ideal. Whereas ancient houses can boost the value of local culture, the architecture through the owner’s style can bring benefits such as being comfortable, and convenient.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-04 | Afdalah Harris | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | 1 | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-24 | Thùy Trang Trần | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-24 | Thùy Trang Trần | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-12 | thaotanya | 73 | view |
- Traffic and housing problems in major cities could be solved by moving large companies and factories and their employees to the countryside To what extend do you agree or disagree with this opinion 73
- People living in large cities today face many problems in their everyday life What are these problems Should governments encourage people to move to smaller regional towns 56
- Today large shopping centers and supermarkets are common than small local shop Is this a negative or positive development 61
- Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show history and culture of their own country rather than works of the other parts in the world To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Organized tour to remote areas and community is increasingly popular Is it a positive or negative development for the local people and the environment 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 668, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[9]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to be' or 'be'.
Suggestion: to be; be
...ned architecture of owner can help them being proud as well as stir their interest af...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, may, moreover, second, so, well, whereas, while, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1921.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 378.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08201058201 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89845814198 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507936507937 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 599.4 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.8967127733 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.066666667 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53333333333 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.382537826789 0.244688304435 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127165093944 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112046447393 0.0667982634062 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250656283834 0.151304729494 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0860986688057 0.056905535591 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.