Some people think that organizing international sports events is good for the host country while others think it is bad. Discuss both views and state your opinion.
Hosting international sports events has been popular for years around the world. It is true that there are controversies whether it brings benefits to the host country or not. While many people object to this activity, I agree with those who advocate the advantages of organizing sports events. In this essay, both views will be discussed.
On the one hand, a country can take advantage of organizing sports events
in many aspects regarding the country’s development. Firstly, the country where big sports events are held can develop tourism. Sports events attract more tourists around the world to go on holiday to famous destinations through promoting the country’s culture and customs alongside the live sports broadcasts. When the tourism sector is bolstered, the economy can also witness a rise. Secondly, when leading the event, it is the opportunity for the host country to gain reputation and enhance the relationships with other countries who participate in the sports events. In the period of organizing sports events, diplomacy is required more, which would require both countries to communicate well in order to ensure the success of the event.
On the other hand, sports events can be prohibitively expensive, affecting directly on the finance of the government. One of the possible drawbacks here is overspending for sports events, which leads to debt. Debts happen when the development of the economy is not substantial to cover a huge amount of money paid for the slot of hosting international events, along with the other budgets for the infrastructure, necessities, facilities needed for smooth operation. Moreover, it will be detrimental to the society when the general populace lose trust for the government because of misspending and corruption. For example, when hosting a sports event, the government must curb public spending on the necessities for the public, especially aids for the poor.
In conclusion, one country can host a sports event if its finance is affordable in order to advance the development progress of the country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-08 | nhattram39 | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-14 | labaongoc | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-02 | thisisme20 | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-02 | thisisme20 | 73 | view |
- Some people think that organizing international sports events is good for the host country while others think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion 73
- The diagram shows how chocolate is produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
- Some people think that organizing international sports events is good for the host country while others think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 17, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ews will be discussed. On the one hand, a country can take advantage of organizi...
^^
Line 2, column 75, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ke advantage of organizing sports events in many aspects regarding the country’s ...
^^^
Line 4, column 637, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...corruption. For example, when hosting a sports event, the government must curb public ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 39, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
... In conclusion, one country can host a sports event if its finance is affordable in o...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1742.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31097560976 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94010581258 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536585365854 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.926894224 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.875 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6875 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313844074431 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111493311032 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515597741524 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188698457532 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.045298062835 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.