Knowing what is right and what is wrong is a very intriguing argument and is becoming a debatable issue. There are individuals who think that learning how to be a good citizen is a responsibility of parents and that home is their venue for it, while others, argue that the perfect location to teach this is in educational institution. To my mind, both parties are needed to teach children how to be a responsible citizen.
Parents are responsible in rearing their children from the day they were born and up to the day they can stand on their own. Because of this thinking, there are others who believe that teaching right and wrong to a child starts under the roof of their houses. Children do what they see and for that reason, what their parents do reflect every child's action. Their mothers and fathers are their idols and they imitate them while they grow up. An example of this is a boy I met at a public market. I saw him pick pocketed an old lady and i had the courage to stop him and when asked why he did that, he said "I was helping my father who did the same so we can celebrate holidays together". This proves that parents have the duty to teach their children how to be a good member of the community.
On the other hand, there are some who believe that schools are the ones responsible for teaching children the correct attitude in every given situation. In the academe, there are subjects related to this like Values Education, Christian Living and Theology. The schools are established as a venue for learning and for that reason they should teach their students to do what is correct and avoid doing what is wrong.
Personally I think, parents and school are both significant in molding children. Parents are their first teachers and schools are their secondary homes. They learn the basics at home and they can put it in action in schools while interacting with other students or even with the teachers.
Overall, being a good citizen is a result of the teachings of both the parents and the school that work together hand in hand.
- The chart below shows the process of waste paper recycling. 61
- Consumption of fast food by Australian teenager 11
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 78
- The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types between 2000 and 2009. 78
- Consumption of Fast Food by Australian teenagers 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 537, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...I saw him pick pocketed an old lady and i had the courage to stop him and when as...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, while, i think, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 13.1623246493 220% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 49.0 24.0651302605 204% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1703.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 370.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6027027027 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47320335657 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486486486486 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4707438528 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.176470588 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7647058824 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.29411764706 7.06120827912 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266243630254 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10115309366 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0827842288115 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168826379482 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0208736941473 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 50.2224549098 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 12.4159519038 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.