Some people think that people who choose a job early and keep doing it are more likely to get a satisfying career life than those who frequently change their jobs To what extent do you agree or disagree

Changing a job is quite difficult for an individual. Some people think that changing a job several times is beneficial for them rather than staying at a same place for longer period. I, agree with the give notion that people who work with the same organization get higher chance of success.

To commence with, people who working in the big company for longer time, obtain higher level of success in their lives. Moreover, it provides them job satisfaction and a chance to get promotion in the future. They not only earn money in the organization, but also get admired from their superiors which gives them sense of job fulfillment. To epitome, a person who work for several years with the same company, get chance for tremendous increment in his remuneration on time and great amount of bonus. Furthermore, a person can achieve their goals and complete dreams on time.

Additionally, people who tend to change their jobs several time more likely to ruin their resume. Changing a job numerous time also creates bad image in front of interviewer or other people. Thus, people not get good amount of package from company as they know these types of people always work for short time. Besides, people who change their duty in short time, some time get stuck and not get a job in some organizations. Therefore, working for long time at a same place has marvelous impact on individuals lives.

To close the discussion, masses who change their jobs frequently are at risk to do not acquire a job in the future as they creates poor image in front of organization.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 124, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'create'
Suggestion: create
...not acquire a job in the future as they creates poor image in front of organization.
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, in short

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1295.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7962962963 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59513367534 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522222222222 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 411.3 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.224078116 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325253822583 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130006361069 0.084324248473 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0893788711921 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226041705153 0.151304729494 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0458767538248 0.056905535591 81% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.