Some people think that a person improves intellectual skills better when doing group activities To what extent do you agree Use specific details and examples to explain your view

Essay topics:

Some people think that a person improves intellectual skills better when doing group activities.  To what extent do you agree? Use specific details and examples to explain your view. 

The importance of studying or learning anything new in a group is pretty large, since starting from kindergarten, and school and beyond, we usually study in a team.
To begin with, I can only agree with the statement that a person improves his intellect better studying with other people in a group. This method of teaching can help a person not only with study, but with communication skills. People not always work with someone they like, and studying in a group can help people to work with each other even if they do not really know each other or do not have common interests. Individual can get help, skills and something new from others who he is studying with.
From my own experience, I can say that improving intellectual skill in a team, more interesting, energetic and diverting. I had individual math courses, where I studied math an hour in a day alone with my teacher, and it was quite boring to me, and I always wanted to sleep, but I cannot say it was useless. After some time, I started to attend another math courses, where there are a lot of people, we all sit together and study at the same time discussing and helping each other. Some students even do not leave after lesson, and just stay studying with friends extra attainments. It is not only entertaining but also useful to make human brain engaged into something. A person do not get tired or bored with other people.
In conclusion, doing activities in a team has a lot of benefits, improving person's acumen and learning new skills

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-04-30 Radhika Chopra 60 view
2023-03-21 xiao_alatus 61 view
2023-02-27 kitemy123 11 view
2023-02-26 kitemy123 11 view
2022-04-29 takimaru 89 view
Essays by user xiao_alatus :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 4, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The importance of studying or learning anyth...
^^
Line 1, column 53, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nce of studying or learning anything new in a group is pretty large, since starti...
^^
Line 2, column 392, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... do not really know each other or do not have common interests. Individual can ge...
^^
Line 2, column 452, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sts. Individual can get help, skills and something new from others who he is stud...
^^
Line 3, column 326, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t say it was useless. After some time, I started to attend another math courses,...
^^
Line 3, column 358, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... time, I started to attend another math courses, where there are a lot of people...
^^
Line 3, column 488, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... discussing and helping each other. Some students even do not leave after lesson,...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, really, so, in conclusion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1243.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62081784387 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58867953393 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568773234201 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 384.3 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.809619238477 865% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3486684823 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.583333333 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4166666667 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.58333333333 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171465899729 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746495104457 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608842917784 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116935051109 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0665290084386 0.056905535591 117% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 50.2224549098 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 12.4159519038 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 78.4519038076 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.