Some people think reading stories in book thanwatching TV or playing computer games for children. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
At the present time, youngsters' growth are influenced by their daily activities. it is believed by a plethora of individuals that adolescents should read stories in book rather than playing console games or watching TV. I, personally, cite the same perspective of this issue for several reasons which will be deliberated in the forthcoming paragraphs.
To begin with, despite the benefits of reading book, in my viewpoint, watching TV provides many good programs for children. They could probably learn some social values from the program such as cartoon and animation as long as they are under parental supervision. For instance, a monkey cartoon -- George monkey-- teaches how to be polite to others. Furthermore, playing console games can highly increase their motoric and sensoric nerves as those have to move their hand balanced and use imagination to win the games. As a result, they will be more creative and easily make a decision.
On the other hand, reading stories has enormous benefits for children because Reading stimulates a complex network of circuits and signals in the brain. The juveniles would deeply think about understanding of vocabularies in the book by searching in dictionary or asking their parent. those could use vocabularies properly, consequently, it can also boost their communication skill. In addition, reading can improve children's memory. Those have to remember tons of plot and subplots, the characters, and their relationship, and the environment in which the story takes place. All of this information creates synapses or strengthen old ones.
In conclusion, it seems to me that reading book bring larger chance to strengthen youngsters' memory and flourish their communication skill. This is provided that the juveniles can learn good values and are under parental supervision.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-07 | Phuong1810 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | dieulinhxinhgai | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-25 | pwlihnkt | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-18 | bepmy2992004 | 67 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 82, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...e influenced by their daily activities. it is believed by a plethora of individual...
^^
Line 4, column 70, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nefits of reading book, in my viewpoint, watching TV provides many good programs ...
^^
Line 4, column 482, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s those have to move their hand balanced and use imagination to win the games. As...
^^
Line 7, column 286, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Those
...g in dictionary or asking their parent. those could use vocabularies properly, conseq...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, furthermore, so, then, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my view, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1546.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42456140351 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93306421099 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610526315789 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.6392118848 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.625 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8125 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.4375 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198773597019 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601393942466 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066622606504 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116506699449 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401141665029 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.