Some people think rich countries should help the poor countries by giving money directly. Others believe that there are other more effective forms of international aid.
What’s your opinion?
Poverty is one of the most detrimental problems faced by many developing countries. However, which type of international aid is most effective for them is a controversial issue. In my view, what they need most is not financial aid or loans, but advanced technologies and talents in certain key areas.
It is obvious that modern technologies and scientific advancement are the driving force behind rich nations. Hi-tech products, innovations, and good management can greatly improve the productivity of a whole society, hence wealth is accumulated at high speed. Therefore, to help the poor, we had better give them tools that can make a fortune.
Moreover, developed countries can not only send teams of experts to poor nations to build roads, dams, factories and other infrastructure, but also train talents and experts for them. Rich countries can provide scholarships of financial help to students from poorer regions, which some famous western universities are actually doing. It is also a wiser way to deliver help.
This is not to say that rich countries should not provide aid in form of money in any case. Of course, money definitely can help a country out of many urgent problems. But we have to make sure that international funds are spent where people really need it rather than filling the pockets of local corrupt politicians.
In summary, there are some other types of aid rich countries may choose to offer more efficiently, for example, providing advanced technologies and talents that can facilitate economic growth sustainably. From this sense, giving money to poor regions is not a direct aid, but an indirect form.
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience Write at least 250 words 84
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both these views and give 73
- The line graph below gives information on cinema attendance in the UK Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, hence, however, if, may, moreover, really, so, therefore, for example, in summary, of course, in any case, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1380.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16853932584 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88340868508 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.61797752809 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2311299555 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5714285714 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0714285714 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85714285714 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339603313601 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101429152244 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0767883151164 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171488461242 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0905299678511 0.056905535591 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.