Some people think that robots are very important for human’s future development. Others, however, think that robots are a dangerous invention that could have negative effects on society. Discuss both views and give your own opinions.
Owing to the advent of robots, they are manipulating a large number of domestic and workplace tasks. Some people are concerned about this ongoing trend, which might be pushing the negative sides of human lives. Looking at it as a whole, I admit that it is inevitable development.
On the one hand, our overreliance on the latest technology has consequences for breaking down our dependency. Indeed, employees are virtually coordinated to cell phones, which one day ran out of battery, preventing them from completing their tasks. Subsequently, it would take a long time to find a way to reconnect with their job promptly. Eventually, assuming the urgent matters are in charge of their job immediately, they are not able to catch up with their duties at a given time.
It is irrefutable that technology has brought a profound approach to the digital era, which has benefits that outweigh the drawbacks. There are two ways in which technology is time-saving and effort-saving for performing their duties. It is a fact that washing clothes take up considerable time without the aid of a washing machine. Apart from that, robots act as a guarantee which would prevent injuries in the workplace. Obviously, in factories where machines contain industry equipment, they are likely to be equipped with protective gear to avoid dangerously seeing what would happen in this place. Nevertheless, robots can be undertaken functional lines.
In conclusion, despite the reluctant response to the detrimental effects of robots on humankind, It is widely credited in the community with its multitasking in accomplishing our performances.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 54, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...advent of robots, they are manipulating a large number of domestic and workplace tasks. Some peop...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, nevertheless, so, apart from, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1367.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25769230769 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.098145561 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.623076923077 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3259908353 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6428571429 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5714285714 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0795690964912 0.244688304435 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0264440392056 0.084324248473 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0334378134636 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0518758924116 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245385754263 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.