Prize distribution in schools facilitates encouragement amongst the students to keep up the good work. Some would argue that pupils showing supremacy in their academics should only be rewarded while others believe that it is better to give rewards only to the students showing progress. Students who are ranked highest in every term are self-motivated young people who do not need motivation from external sources. Whereas, youngsters, who are not having such innate ability and showing some progress in elevating their grades, should be encouraged to touch down the desired excellence; therefore, I firmly believe that they are only rewarded.
Rewarding the best scoring students would distinguish them from other students in the class, which may lead to detrimental consequences. This includes the feeling of dismay within average or low performing students caused by giving a prize every time to the students of the year. This causes poor-performing students to remain at the same level until the end of their education which in turn, eliminates the option for them to improve their academic knowledge. To illustrate, it has been postulated in a study that the chances of improvement for any low-grade students in their academics are negligible in the institutes where students performing best academically only receives awards.
On the other hand, prizes are useful tools to make low-ranking students improve their ranks in forthcoming terms. It can be beneficial in many ways for rewarding students who show significant progress in their academic results. Firstly, since those students are from a huge portion of the class, they not only get motivated but other same or lower graded students also get inspired by their achievements. For instance, schools having this kind of reward system usually sees healthy competitions amongst the students for getting rewards after their friends get rewarded through making improvements in studies. This how schools produce young generations of good quality. Secondly, the overall IQ level of human being also increases through such kind of reward system. In other words, every school following such a system would contribute to the betterment of youth by levelling up the brainpower of young people.
To conclude, I am with the people believing in the prizing arrangements for the students who make improvements in their studies since due to that, most of the students will get motivated to compete with each other in order to receive honours in succeeding academic terms. It is recommended that if humans desire to decipher their dormant brain power then schools need to have a progress based reward system.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, whereas, while, for instance, kind of, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 41.998997996 160% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2235.0 1615.20841683 138% => OK
No of words: 421.0 315.596192385 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30878859857 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79865824429 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532066508314 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 683.1 506.74238477 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5272139174 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.470588235 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7647058824 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64705882353 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368898655164 0.244688304435 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129055266652 0.084324248473 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0813795594244 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248564237644 0.151304729494 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0648602381574 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.