There are two split opinion regarding methods of teaching. Some voice that students should be taught according to their academic strength ; whereas, others say that students should be studied in group with various abilities. Before arriving on my opinion both the views are discussed further.
Examining the former view, why students should be taught by their capacity. The prime reason is that grasping all curriculum is not a cup of tea for every students. IQ power of students are different, so same teaching method is not fruitfulness for all ,and pupils who is poor in study they need extra class. Moreover, many schools discriminat their class according to level of students. Owing to this, it is beneficial for brilliant students who have tough competition and encourage to studies more, however, teachers monitor and give more attention, who are dull in studies, in lower level class.
Examining the latter view, when students study with others in group, then they have more chance to express their skills. Firstly, mix class of students help eachothers in their studies. Consequently, some bright students assist who are poor in study, and it can be encourage for study harder and being competitive. Secondly, group study enhances learner skills. As a result, they not only learn how to contribute their knowledge with others, but also it improves communication and other professional development skills.
To conclude and give my opinion, I support the latter view, students should be taught together as they build many skills and it is win-win situation for them in future. However, mentors could teach extra hours to those who are poor in study.
- Countries with a long average working time are more economically successful than those countries which do not have a long working time. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Countries with a long average working time are more economically successful than those countries which do not have a long working time. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Some teachers think that international student exchange would be beneficial for all teenage school students.Do you think its advantages will outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- In the future, it seems it will be more difficult to live on the earth. Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planets to live, such as Mars. To what extent, do you agree or disagree?Some people argue that living on earth is bec 73
- Some people think that schools should select students according to their academic abilities, while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities studying together. Discuss both views and state your own opinion. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 226, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Before” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...tudied in group with various abilities. Before arriving on my opinion both the views a...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 253, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ching method is not fruitfulness for all ,and pupils who is poor in study they nee...
^^
Line 7, column 159, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ls and it is win-win situation for them in future. However, mentors could teach extra hou...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, whereas, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1396.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18959107807 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61173882657 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587360594796 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.3355861544 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0666666667 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9333333333 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305272313164 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103960247686 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0827707603668 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202344811644 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101536468152 0.056905535591 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.