Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it. Others think students should spend time on important subjects. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Food study in school cirriculums has been taken into consideration for a long time. While some persons claim that valuable time at school should be spent only on academic and important subjects, which are indispensable for everyone’s career, others truly believe that culinary courses are of paramount significance and should be brought in educational institutions because cooking is a survival skill and allow humans to live independently.
It is a well-known fact that compulsory subjects at school are imperative for one’s future. Those key ones offering an abundance of foundational knowledge, which helps in boosting students’ career prospects and provide more job oppotunities for graduates than unskilled laborers or general workforce . Moreover, academic studyings at school are prerequisites to nuanced problem-solving skills, allowing them to smoothly transit into a Professional working environment. Particulartly, logical thinkings acquired during math lessons equip operation and arrangement skills for a potential director while critical thinkings fosterd by literature helps learners leave a good impression and be promoted.
On the other hand, possessing a solid understanding of food and cooking can not only ensure general well-being but also serve as a basic survival skill. First and foremost, students now usually fail to pay attention to nutrition in their daily meals. Day by day, undernourished conditions or eating out of control can lead to malnutrition or obesity, which are detrimental to humans’ health growth. Being proficient with culinary skills allow graduates to modify their dietary patterns variously and in the way they favor. Thanks to the state of being well-rounded about food, those ones can become more independently and don’t have to wait for readily available dishes or processed food at convenience stores anymore.
In conclusion, although prioritizing traditional school curriculums due to the importance of compulsory subjects to students’ career, imparting knowledge of nutrition and food preparation is essential as well because it offers individuals a free-standing life. Therefore, the science of food should be added to educational institutions’ timetable for humans’ fully development.
- Nowadays more and more women decide to have children later in their life Why Does the advantage or disadvantage 89
- Fewer schools are requiring children to learn and improve their handwriting skills Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages of this trend 84
- Modern technology has made it easier for individuals to download copyrighted music and books from the internet for no charge To what extent is this a positive or a negative development 73
- Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets and there is no need to go to the cinema Others say that to be fully enjoyed films need to be seen in a cinema 84
- Fewer schools are requiring children to learn and improve their handwriting skills Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages of this trend 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 300, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... unskilled laborers or general workforce . Moreover, academic studyings at school ...
^^
Line 5, column 578, Rule ID: THESE_ONES[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'those' instead.
Suggestion: those
...state of being well-rounded about food, those ones can become more independently and don’t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1934.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.87841945289 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28901111629 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659574468085 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 594.0 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.362869705 49.4020404114 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.769230769 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3076923077 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07692307692 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181398888884 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058524743249 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426123979281 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116759605957 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484217177823 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.12 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.54 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.