Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it. Others think students should spend time on more important subjects. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Over the recent years, it has become a topic of debates as a section of society believes that the science of food should be included in the academic curriculum and students should be classically trained on how to build a balanced diet for themselves. Meanwhile, others argue that it is a waste of time. Even though both points of view are sensible, I firmly support the idea of studying the science of food and how to prepare it at a young age.
On the one hand, opponents of investing students’ time in culinary-related programs claim that there have already been numerous subjects and activities which play more pivotal roles in educating pupils than food science such as mathematics, IT, or literature. Moreover, most schools offer canteens where students can be served a wide range of healthy and nutritious meals. Therefore, nutrition study is not necessary and should not be made an official subject in the syllabus.
Conversely, proponents of this proposal believe that it will bring a number of advantages. Firstly, food science is closely related to the study of human biology, including the working mechanism of the immune system and the body's need for a balanced diet. By acknowledging accurate nutrition facts students realize the adverse effects that junk food has on their bodies, which is also an extremely practical solution to mitigate the problem of obesity among youngsters. Secondly, food science is also linked to biochemistry. For that reason, enrolling in culinary courses helps expand knowledge on artificial coloring, flavoring and preservatives, so that learners can read food labelings and control what they consume more efficiently. Lastly, understanding the importance of food science prepares school-aged teenagers for the real world. As adults, they will have to take care of themselves, in which process developing healthy eating habits is a key factor.
In conclusion, I personally agree with the opinion that nutrition-related programs should be made compulsory in schools as it is realistic, useful and prepares adolescents for adulthood.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-07 | hi.nguyn91 | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-12 | claraa_ltn | 89 | view |
| 2021-10-27 | Miaa | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-17 | Ester Nguyễn | 61 | view |
| 2021-08-17 | Ester Nguyễn | 67 | view |
- The unlimited use of cars may cause many problems What are those problems In order to reduce the problems should we discourage people from using cars 84
- Fossil fuels such as coal oil and natural gas are used in many countries The use of alternative sources of energy including wind and solar power is encouraged Is this trend a positive or negative development 73
- The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in London 2000 2010 73
- Prison is the best punishment for criminals Discuss 84
- People generally know that the environment is important However most individuals still don t take responsibility to protect the environment Why is this What should ben done to encourage people to protect the environment 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, first, firstly, if, lastly, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1749.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01249464181 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615151515152 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.9236184488 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.928571429 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5714285714 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282938400412 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867904957903 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054225288764 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16813284275 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0708848998656 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.14 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.