Task 2: Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it. Others think students should spend time on more important subjects. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is incontrovertible that there are several conflicting arguments about studying food science and its preparation. While there is a widespread belief that these subjects should be made obsolete from the curriculum, I firmly concur that the science of food and preparation should form an integral part of educational institutions.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that timetables in secondary school have already been full of several crucial subjects. Moreover, it is impossible to compare them with food-related subjects in terms of their essentiality for students to move up to a career ladder. For example, several subjects such as mathematics, natural science, and IT, along with many vital soft skills such as communication or teamwork, play an indispensable role for students to gain more job prospects when entering adult life. Sometimes, there are also some apprenticeship programs or voluntary activities included in the schedules, which are occupied full of available spaces in the timetable.
On the other hand, I believe that food and diet are of paramount importance for health, which should be a part of the student curriculum. Firstly, the knowledge of food science is also related to human biology, involving the study of building up the immune system, and the effects of a balanced diet on human health. Furthermore, it is also related to biochemistry. Thus, students can be provided with more opportunities to have a good grasp of coloring and flavoring, as well as food labeling and chemical preservatives, which may play a crucial role for those who want to pursue their university in biology or medicine. Finally, being equipped with knowledge of food science also raise health awareness among students, which helps them practice hygiene standards and obtain the lifelong skill of preparing nutritious and home-cooked foods.
In conclusion, although the school curriculum is crowded, I still agree with the opinion that food science and its preparation must be compulsory lectures in the study plans of students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-07 | hi.nguyn91 | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-12 | claraa_ltn | 89 | view |
| 2021-10-27 | Miaa | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-17 | Ester Nguyễn | 61 | view |
| 2021-08-17 | Ester Nguyễn | 67 | view |
- Task 2 Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think students should spend time on more important subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Task 2 In many countries today people in cities either live alone or in small family units rather than in large family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 78
- Nowadays people depend on technology for leisure activities Is this a positive or negative development 89
- Task 1 The chart shows the percentage of males and females who were overweight in Australia from 1980 to 2010
- Task 2 Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 187, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ectures in the study plans of students.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, moreover, second, so, still, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1720.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34161490683 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06030965073 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.5088488646 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.333333333 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8333333333 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.9166666667 7.06120827912 197% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216468495926 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0778352213068 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571965328919 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135171396182 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374680367265 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.