Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think that school time should be used in learning important subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion

Many people acknowledge that learning the science of food and how to prepare it is imperative for students. Others consider merely learning academic subjects during school time would be a reasonable choice. I opine that students can simultaneously learn mandatory subjects and other essential skills such as cooking and food science as they are crucial skills for everyone to learn from their early days.

To begin with, the supporters of the former view believe that schools should focus on teaching the students about food and how to prepare it. They think that teaching food science is imperative as its knowledge helps children in the future. Moreover, if a child is knowledgeable of food science and how nutritious food would keep their body fit, that would invigorate them to choose correct food habits. In addition, cooking is a necessity and should be taught to everyone irrespective of gender. Furthermore, learning the science of food and how to prepare it can also drive motivation to learn about other related subjects.

However, others who think school days should be used to learn essential subjects such as mathematics and science would argue that these subjects help students make successful careers later in life. These subjects construct a solid background of knowledge for the pupils and help them catch up with a constantly changing world. As per their set of beliefs, students can acquire knowledge related to food in their life after their education.

In conclusion, even though some classes may be fundamental to passing the tests, preparing a proper healthy meal should be taught at school since it provides children with a vital capability to take care of themselves when they are on their own.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 384, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to correct'
Suggestion: to correct
...t, that would invigorate them to choose correct food habits. In addition, cooking is a ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1448.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15302491103 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66490308235 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53024911032 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5017174115 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.666666667 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4166666667 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.41666666667 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.394042369446 0.244688304435 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147794917236 0.084324248473 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.075683876133 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22885437714 0.151304729494 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0683137530689 0.056905535591 120% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.