It is common in schools for students to concentrate and learn all the subjects. Although this offers certain advantages to the next generation, I believe paying closer attention to the subject that teenagers interested or show talent will bring them more benefit in the future.
Admittedly, the school curriculum is tailored to impart basic knowledge about human culture and our world, which is of significance for learners' overall development. This also provides young people with a range of options in a later period, particularly when they are capable and mature enough for choosing a career. However, emphasizing all the subjects may create undue pressure on teenagers, and some pupils are forced to toil away what they show no interest, ending up in weariness in the study. Also, it is teachers and parents who should take the responsibility to help pupils possess and develop their curiosities and interests.
On the other hand, converging all their attention on a certain subject can lead to a more successful life. The teen years are the prime and suitable time to start a professional life since it is the most precious period in life full of curiosity, originality and creativity. By focusing on a specific field, children can make the best use of their interests or talents to improve professional performance, which opens the door to a prosperous future. For example, most successful celebrity or sports stars only focused on their talented area in the teen years and spent their time practicing or doing regular training to improve their professional performance. Also, irrelevant courses excluded, teenagers can achieve their targets and goals easily and efficiently, which will boost students’ self-confidence and stimulate their interests. Once a child develops interests, the study will be enjoyable and captivating. This can motivate their levels to staggering heights.
In conclusion, giving priority to specific subjects that young generation show interest or talents brings them a brighter future.
- Some people believe that parents have a great influence on children s growth but others think that influence from the outside plays a more important role Discuss both views and give your own opinion 79
- Some people think that teenagers should concentrate on all subjects at school. Others believe that teenagers should focus on the subjects they are best at or they are most interested in. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some people think that teenagers should concentrate on all subjects at school. Others believe that teenagers should focus on the subjects they are best at or they are most interested in. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 89
- Some people think sending criminals to prison is not an effective way to deal with them. Education and training are better. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1717.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39937106918 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97412632483 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606918238994 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8319291919 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.642857143 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21428571429 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184481606861 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0578289733397 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424326011422 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115095799074 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319657671497 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.