Some people think that there should be strict laws to control the amount of noise a person makes because of the disturbance it causes to people.
It is normal for some people to entertain themselves by listening to music either in concert or in their home. However, other people argue that the government should to regulate a regulation in limiting noises because the noises can disturbance others.
First of all, one thinks that needs to remember are what kind of limitation and where it should be regulated? It is included volume and/or either in public space or at a home? Both of them have their own advantages and disadvantages. In the public space, the limitation noise regulation may reduce the crime rate because the crowded event like concert or festival usually attracts a thief pocket to take action. In addition, the concert audience often consumes alcohol that has a potential to next accident like drive car accidents. Then, in the residential area, the limitation noise regulation may make the neighbor around more behave and respect others privacy.
On the other hand, the limitation noise regulation, particularly in the time, also has drawbacks. As an example of this is a night festival event. If there is a limitation in the time, it will cut food stalls profits. Because in the event like that more people usually come after late. Then in concert, limitation in volume may harm creativity, because a heavy metal concert like "LinkinPark", a high volume is needed to entertain the audiences.
To sum up, a limitation of noise is good as long as it maintains in a good manner and in the right place. Places like resident area, a limitation noise regulation is good to provide a convenience felling. However, in a certain event like a concert and night festival, the regulation should not apply.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-16 | tam362 | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-04 | Jonkun | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-04 | hasanadjieb | 61 | view |
| 2018-03-27 | jackwings923 | 77 | view |
| 2018-03-27 | jackwings923 | 73 | view |
- The table below shows social and economic indicators for four countries in 1994, according to United Nations statistics.Describe the information shown below in your own words. What implications do the indicators have for the countries? 61
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement. 56
- It is better to live in a city than in a small town. Do you agree? 61
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, Divided into three categories, from 1995-2002. 70
- The diagram below shows the average hours of unpaid work per week done by people in different categories. (Unpaid work refers to such activities as childcare in the home, housework and gardening.)Describe the information presented below, comparing results 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 99, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ularly in the time, also has drawbacks. As an example of this is a night festival ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, so, then, in addition, kind of, first of all, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1408.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01067615658 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92405010583 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537366548043 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.6788746249 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.0 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5625 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5625 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154007570431 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0510513112302 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545609594689 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109619789096 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0632574843441 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.