There is an ongoing debate whether people have the right to utilise fresh water as much as they want, or regimes need to control the usage of this valuable resource. I believe that central officials should take heed of the consumption of clean water.
On the one hand, it is thought by one school of society that the government should take over the control of utilisation of fresh water by providing a limited supply of it to the public. Because it will prevent the wastage of water. It id irrefutable that clean water is wasted by the folks due to carelessness, and it is a limited resource. Therefore, by providing clean water for fixed hours per day to the public by the central officials can prevent this excessive consumption of fresh water.
On the other hand, contradictors reckon that public should be the one to take control of the fresh water consumption as everyone has different needs. People belonging to different areas like rural or urban have different requirements and lifestyle. Putting limitations on a natural resource like water may affect these people. For example, people from rural areas perform agricultural practices for which they require water for irrigation purposes. If they are provided with limited supplies of fresh water, the farmers may not be able to irrigate the fields properly, hence they may suffer.
In my perception, the central officials should need to provide fresh water to the public as it would lead to the availability of water to the areas facing water scarcity. People will no more have to worry about overcoming the issue, while the government should be the one, who will be responsible to provide fresh water in order to mitigate the water shortage problem.
In conclusion, although everyone has the right to consume as much fresh water as they need, I reckon that it should be the government to decide that how much water should be utilised by the public in order to avoid wastage, and to make it available to everyone.
- In many countries these days the number of people continuing their education after school has increased and the range of courses available at universities and colleges has also increased Do you think this as a positive or negative development 73
- Some people think they have the right to use as much as fresh water they want others believe government should control the use of water as it limited resource Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The table illustrates the population size of 10 major countries in the year 2010 and 2100 The figures demonstrate a clear increase in population size in 2100 compared to 2010 100
- The graphs below show the number of men and women in full and part time employment in Australia between 1973 and 1993 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 40
- The table below gives information about languages with the most native speakers Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 187, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...g a limited supply of it to the public. Because it will prevent the wastage of water. I...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, i reckon, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1648.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89020771513 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63319636774 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.459940652819 0.561755894193 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0972763281 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.714285714 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0714285714 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64285714286 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372010110887 0.244688304435 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145991067873 0.084324248473 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0587915912778 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241739845524 0.151304729494 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396452112651 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.