Some people think that university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Whether university students should have the freedom to pursue their favourite subjects remains a question of heated debate. Some people strongly advocate this idea, while others believe only science and technology related subjects are necessary. I will discuss both these views in my following essay.
On the one hand, allowing university students to choose their favourite majors will bring them motivation and passion to make progress. Hence, they’ll be more knowledgeable and prepared to take challenges. Therefore, it is totally absurb to force students to study compulsory subjects as this policy would deprive their interests and increase the likelihood of dropping out of school. Besides, all subjects are of equal importance and it is impossible to predict what areas of knowledge will take advantage in the future. For example, there’ll be entirely new fields that require high levels of creativity rather than practical and technical skills. In this case, the society would need more students of art, history and philosophy than science and technology.
On the contrary, it can be argued that in this technological era, science and technology can provide more job opportunities, career progression, better salaries, and therefore an improved quality of life for students who take them. On the societal level, by forcing people to choose particular university subjects, governments can ensure that any knowledge and skill gaps in the economy are covered. What’s more, a focus on technology in higher education could lead to new inventions, economic growth, and greater future prosperity.
In conclusion, although it seems sensible for universtities to focus on the most useful subjects, I still prefer a system in which people have free choices to study what they are passionate about.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-19 | Hai Anh Phan Thi | 67 | view |
| 2020-02-28 | Emmaaa | 61 | view |
- With the pressure on today s young people to succeed academically some people believe that non academic subjects at school e g physical education and cookery should be removed from the syllabus so that children can concentrate wholly on academic subjects 89
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- It has been argued that parents of children who break the law should be punished because they are responsible for their children s actions To what extent do you agree or disagree 85
- With the considerable benefits computers and the Internet brings about they can completely replace the traditional roles of teachers Do you agree or disagree 78
- The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments on driving offenses To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Whether university students should have the fre...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, hence, if, so, still, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1527.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47311827957 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84163167379 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634408602151 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9102546202 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.461538462 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4615384615 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07692307692 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30582451149 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0879064532593 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508192148593 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162607016995 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0509405060923 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.