Some people think that water is an important natural resource and government should have a control on water supply as it in limited. Other do not agree with this statement. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Nature has blessed us abundance of natural resources for survival of living beings. Preseny, some people assert that water is a significant natural resource but scarcity of water is a worrying concern. Thus, it is necessary to control the supply of water. By contrast, others have conflicting views. This essay intends to account for both sides with my own preception.
There are manifold points to endore the former view. First and foremost, the demand of fresh water is exceeding the supply and therefore it is necessary to vontrol the supply by making song laws or rules. To make it clear, the population of whole world has been growing noticeably for last few decades. More and more people on the planet need more water for their daily needs such as washing cloths, cleaning, drinking and making food. On the other hand, the level of fresh water is declining because of lack of rainfall, deforestation and climate changes. Therefore it is important to make some rules so that wastage of water can be controlled and supply the water in a wise manners. What is more, controlling the supply of water can discourage careless attitude of people towards use of water. For example, in some countries, people show careless attitude towards water and waste water in a huge amount. People consume more than necessary for different purposes such as washing and other household purposes. In some rural areas, people do not have tap controller and it leads to wastage of water. Thus, government should regulate the supply that people do not take water for granted.
Numerous can be mentioned to endore the latter initially. Water is a more salient basic need for survival of mankind and controlling the water supply can be cause many inconvenience. For example, people need water for their daily needs and in the big faimly people may face many problems in the shortage of water. People cannot be able to manage their daily needs if the supply is limited because of control. Needless to say, limiting the avilibility of water is not justifiable. Moreover, government should make efforts to explore water sources rather than controlling the supply.
To recapitulate, undependly, the for water is most important and it should be kept free from restrictions. However, in my opinion, taking the scarcity of water into consumption, it has become urgent make some rules for the usage of water.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-18 | Guri473812 | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European county between 1979 and 2004
- In recent years children have been given more freedom than in tha past Do you think this is positive or a negative development 67
- Some people think that water is an important natural resource and government should have a control on water supply as it in limited Other do not agree with this statement Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Some people think that governments should provide subsidies to farmers to produce cheap healthy food Others think that governments should tax companies producing unhealthy foods Give your own opinion and examples 73
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons and how can people research this 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 558, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...all, deforestation and climate changes. Therefore it is important to make some rules so t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 677, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'manner'?
Suggestion: manner
...ntrolled and supply the water in a wise manners. What is more, controlling the supply o...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 155, Rule ID: BE_CAUSE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'because'?
Suggestion: because
...nd and controlling the water supply can be cause many inconvenience. For example, people...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 164, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun inconvenience seems to be countable; consider using: 'many inconveniences'.
Suggestion: many inconveniences
...ntrolling the water supply can be cause many inconvenience. For example, people need water for the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for example, such as, in my opinion, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1990.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 398.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61116571849 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489949748744 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 634.5 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.7373160426 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.9166666667 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5833333333 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.397877610374 0.244688304435 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13197722085 0.084324248473 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730449928333 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26364558133 0.151304729494 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587362572399 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.