Some people think we do not need museums any more in the modern world. Do you agree or disagree?
Some individuals feel that in the-state-of-the-art era the presence of museums loses its popularity among society. In my view, I partially accord with this issue to certain respects which I will elucidate in the subsequent paragraph.
On the one hand, the popularity of museums nowadays can increase the national revenue by contributing annual taxes gained from the entrance ticket and visitor’s spendings on accommodation and souvenirs. Regarding the GDP contribution of travel and tourism, for several decades, the U.S. museums have received more than $50 Billion. Furthermore, in terms of contextual teaching methods, the museum’s presence might assist learners to enrich the sense of art of value. Not only with firsthand experience towards historical objects (artefacts) and fine arts but also the reliable information of intensive understanding.
On the other hand, the development and maintenance of museums need big financial investment. Some might witness the annual special treatment expenses for perishable objects because the more bills encumber the management enhance, the less museums sites will be. In addition, digitalization learning enables unlimited access and geographic location without having to spend a wealth of budgets. Considering society 5.0 era, learning through various digital platforms is more flexible and interactive, because visual tour websites are provided by famous museums around the world.
To sum up, from my perspective, the absence of historical buildings would bring substantially advantageous aspects ranging from the financial constraints of revitalisation to modern virtual learning activities. This is provided that the museums still generate cash for the national economy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-18 | Thai Tran | 84 | view |
- Robots can free people from difficult and dangerous work However some people are worried about the possible dangers robots may create Discuss the benefits of using robots and the possible dangers from it 89
- The world has many towns and cities constructed in previous centuries that were more suitable and livable for people in those times than they are now What problems will this cause What can be done to solve these problems 89
- Companies spend millions each year on advertising online in magazines and on billboards These adverts can encourage people to buy goods that they do not really need What are the positive and negative effects of consumerism 89
- The rise of social media platforms has made it easier for people to vent their frustrations and complaints publicly What is the consequence of this trend Is there any benefit to expressing complaints on social media 70
- Consumers are faced with increasing numbers of advertisements from competing companies To what extent do you think consumers are influenced by advertisements What measures can be taken to protect them 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 128, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...s popularity among society. In my view, I partially accord with this issue to cer...
^
Line 1, column 189, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...th this issue to certain respects which I will elucidate in the subsequent paragr...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, regarding, so, still, in addition, in my view, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1479.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.89243027888 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17794957515 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.677290836653 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8577331128 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.25 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9166666667 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130964217409 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0449938150646 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.034178798838 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0708693818213 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334240149169 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.88 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.86 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.