Some people think that the world should have one government rather than national governments. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
There are some ideas that instead of the world's countries with particular governments, it will be better to establish a world government. While this view can be advantageous to a certain extent, I believe that its disadvantages are much more significant.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that some benefits can be realized if the world is operated under the same government system. One of them is that it could encourage member countries to contribute collectively to solve common problems. For example, climate change is always an international issue that causes concern for most nations. However, each country has different abilities of resources, finance, as well as, uses distinctive methods to deal with the problems, which makes this issue more serious for undeveloped states. Therefore, a global government would help to address this condition consistently when they can share their experiences and technology in other areas. Additionally, it could potentially remove existing conflicts between nations. Clearly, regional and political alliances would be dissolved, and everyone would work for a common good, which would end up the wars among countries.
On the other hand, I am of the opinion that the limitations of global governance are greater than the above advantages. To begin with, it will be very difficult for one government to adequately address the needs of every person worldwide, as well as, to control well the whole system. Whatever how hard the leaders of this new government try, they also could not manage universally every problem in a wide earth with six continents. For instance, corruption is now an alarming situation for any countries, which will become harder to keep in check if it has only a government, and the bureaucracy can be increasingly serious. A part from this advantage, there may be a loss of individual cultural identities because of homogenization, especially relating to language. Each nation has different languages and customs, creating a diversity of cultural traditions and showing the unique features among regions. The combination of national governments can make these traditions disappear as if the residents forget slowly their origin.
In conclusion, the system of a global governance also brings some particular benefits, I still argue that its downsides are superior to the efficient aspects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-27 | Lê Quỳnh Mai | 89 | view |
| 2021-10-30 | minhminhvu7 | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-09 | Sanaullah97 | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-09 | Sanaullah97 | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-09 | Sanaullah97 | 73 | view |
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies Do you agree or disagree 75
- The tradition that the family gets together to eat meals is disappearing What are the reasons What are the impacts 73
- The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1997 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behaviour Others disagree and think that the host country should welcome cultural differences Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of people living alone in 5 different age groups in the USA between 1850 and 2000 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1993.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 371.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37196765499 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03418333016 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 176.041082164 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592991913747 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 626.4 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.3539431634 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 117.235294118 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8235294118 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.82352941176 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173671111958 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0565939126287 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542774260507 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108774082953 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.017084632123 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.