The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments on driving offenses. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
At present, to ensure transport safety, many countries in the world have imposed rigorous punishments on drivers having mistakes. It is clear that this method is actually necessary, but it is certainly the only way to enhance road safety while some other measures are also very useful.
On the one hand, the effectiveness of retribution is undeniable. The major reason for this efficiency is that most people have a common awareness of the fear and the anxiety when they must face the punishments relating to the laws. In fact, depending on the serious levels of violations, various forms will be offered to punish individuals. The simplest is compulsory retribution for money such as the drivers taking part in traffic with a higher speech than regulations or without wearing a helmet. Besides, some serious accidents that cause losses about the health and the wealth of other people even can suffer the criminal responsibilities. All are forced the drivers to be more careful when participating in road traffic.
On the other hand, apart from harsh penalties that are published by governments, there are also some additional measures to improve road safety more effectively. To begin with, local authorities should install a system of tracking cameras across all the roads. Today, it can be seen easily that a lot of areas of many nations are adopted this effective equipment, especially in large cities, which will bring the drivers perception of the need to adhere to speech limits. Additionally, the investment and the construction of the road infrastructure is a long-term method to minimize traffic accidents. Clearly, a lot of accidents have occurred because of the deterioration of the road system with limited and outdated scale. Therefore, expanding and updating the facilities certainly will contribute to ensuring a stable transporting mechanism.
In conclusion, while harsh penalties will be advantageous to a certain extent, I believe that only this method is still not enough to solve the problem of road safety. It needs to be accompanied by other reasonable solutions.
- Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behaviour Others disagree and think that the host country should welcome cultural differences Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1997 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Small businesses are disappearing and being replaced by large multinational companies Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 92
- The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010 Billions of US dollars 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 The US 9 7 10 5 13 5 18 22 7 EU countries 3 3 3 4 3 8 3 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 269, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng cameras across all the roads. Today, it can be seen easily that a lot of area...
^^
Line 3, column 416, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'drivers'' or 'driver's'?
Suggestion: drivers'; driver's
...y in large cities, which will bring the drivers perception of the need to adhere to spe...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, so, still, therefore, while, apart from, in conclusion, in fact, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1760.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25373134328 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98736330173 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573134328358 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9729889269 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9375 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110137292902 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0331834317255 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039493215582 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0741546480874 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0279361561669 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.