Some people think that zoos are cruel and all the zoos should be closed However others think that zoos are useful to protect rare animals Discuss both views and give your own opinion

Essay topics:

Some people think that zoos are cruel and all the zoos should be closed. However, others think that zoos are useful to protect rare animals. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Animals are beautiful creatures on this planet. The planet Earth would look bad without these different and vast variety of creatures. At first, human beings were also animals then transformation made us like this. That’s why, there is saying that human being are social animals. A section of people opine that Zoos are not good for animals; however, other assert that it is the only way to protect endangered species. Both the sides of arguments present the rational ideas of the topic which will be dilated in the following paragraphs, followed by my opinion.
Beyond any qualms, there are several compelling reasons to prove that Zoos are really good place for animals and it should not be closed. First, zoos provide protective environment to the animals free from cruelty like poaching. Moreover, provide the same set of habitat and food according to their needs. For instance, in zoos, there are expert zoologist who keep an eye on the health of animals and provide food and medicines according to necessity. An animal who is living in the zoo and the same animal living in open forest area may differ in their health checklists and life expectancy.
On the contrary, there are myriad of logical thoughts to support the other view. A section of people believe that zoo is the not original habitat of animals and they should live as freely they want. In addition, controlled environment affects their ability of hunting and normal life activities. A salient example is that when we watch documentary on discovery channel on television about the real-life struggle, perform by animals in the forest area, for their food hunt and other kinds of danger from big and superior animals. We can notice that they are efficient in their skills but not the zoo animals can do these tasks as they are living in controlled setting.
However, I second with the view that right amount of controlled environment and as well as freedom in zoos can still help animals to stay healthy and fit and can perform their skills and tasks, whatever they do in the forest. To exemplify, provide them large open area like forest reserves rather than small sections in zoo.
Although, it has positive side as we can go and see them in forest safaris, but the negative side also as they are bound to live in small sections and can not perform their daily routine hunting as they do in forest. But what will be the future about big forest reserves or small zoos? Still stays a question for many persons.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-11-09 tsln7607 73 view
2020-08-18 sonamwill 73 view
2020-04-29 lostsonam 78 view
Essays by user sonamwill :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 346, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'zoologists'?
Suggestion: zoologists
...For instance, in zoos, there are expert zoologist who keep an eye on the health of animal...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ill stays a question for many persons.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, may, moreover, really, second, so, still, then, well, for instance, in addition, as well as, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2061.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 428.0 315.596192385 136% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81542056075 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40698548678 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509345794393 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 639.9 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7750837953 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.1428571429 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.380952381 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90476190476 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212868318371 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.069217805143 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566323285587 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124043178416 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400421985093 0.056905535591 70% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.