Punishing children has been popular method to enforce discipline among children in many societies. Although physical punishment may have been popular option, recent trend suggests otherwise. This essay will argue why harshly punishing children is not a suitable option for teaching discipline.
Physical violence remains an easy option for many parents to teach required life skills to their kids. They are always cautious about the way children are behaving, which may not be as they wished, therefore, forcing them to use power. Children's behavior may not be social at times, like excessive violence with their peers, which forces parents to become more aggressive to correct such habits. Indeed, there are numerous reports suggesting punishment may work in case of radically aggressive children, but the reliability of such reports is always questioned. Use of power could be a way to teach one's child a lesson, but it is no way justified by science.
For one, punishing children makes them psychologically less confident. An aggressive environment at home could hamper their ability to face new people and situations. In fact, research by the South African government has clearly identified the issue of children not able to speak in public who were harshly beaten at home. Furthermore, with the development of new system, there are various alternatives to educate children who show disapproving behavior. For example, sports academies are viable option to install discipline onto a child. Children are mentally affected when power is used as tool to reinforce discipline, therefore, admission to sports academies may be the way to go forward.
This essay argued that physical punishment is not a good way to teach discipline as it can negatively impact child physic and better option in form of sports center can be used. In my opinion, beating children is absolutely worse choice to teach discipline as it can results in negativity among children.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 600, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...d. Use of power could be a way to teach ones child a lesson, but it is no way justif...
^^^^
Line 7, column 268, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'result'
Suggestion: result
...se choice to teach discipline as it can results in negativity among children.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, may, so, therefore, as to, for example, in fact, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1652.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31189710611 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80890206878 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575562700965 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.053605004 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.25 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4375 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16921328413 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0593980951087 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0307436913797 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109347604129 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00991831611039 0.056905535591 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.