There is a debate whether government should spend financial expenditure on searching for life in the universe, in which some individuals believe it is a must while others argues that it is a waste instead.
On the one hand, it is reasonable to search for extraterrestrial life. First, human beings are naturally curious, and it is through this curiosity that we have accomplished incredible feats. In the past time, the technology of boosting agricultural productivity was invented when we struggled with hunger. We can expect there will be more and more scientific discoveries if we continue to make efforts to explore the universe. Second, only government have the ability to carry out the duty of searching for life with the tax revenue given that it is impossible for companies to have the willingness to do it because of the bankruptcy risk.
On the other hand, there are several reasons why it is viewed as a waste by certain people. First, there are more pressing development issue which demand the urgent treatment of government. For instance, a lot of people are battling to improve their life standards given that the agricultural productivity there could only let them live and they lack extra fund to invest more in material capital or human capital. Second, there will be a huge opportunity cost for the searching activity due to the limited resources of government, which is exacerbated if the activity is not successful. The searching activity may crowd out the potential expenditure on other project and slow down the rate of society’s construction.
From my perspective, I think the government should balance the issues between the universe and reality to ensure the urgent development concerns could be addressed as a priority.
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people Recently however archaeol 55
- People should undertake risky action only after they have carefully considered its consequences 66
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants Butter has now been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States Only about 2 percent of customers have complain 38
- Claim Group assignments that students must work together to complete should replace a substantial amount of traditional lecture based instruction in college and university courses Reason It is vital for students to gain experience collaborating with peers 83
- The following was written as a part of an application for a small business loan by a group of developersin the city of Monroe A jazz music club in Monroe would be a tremendously profitable enterprise Currently the nearest jazzclub is 65 miles away thu 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 198, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...e accomplished incredible feats. In the past time, the technology of boosting agricultura...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, second, so, while, for instance, i think, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10104529617 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98728828033 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567944250871 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5369530979 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9166666667 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179242733558 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648435677038 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0599983727415 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112813182344 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0608845475097 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.