In this argument, the authors recommends that southeastern Grilldon could be the site for the next HobCo Hobby Shop for HobCo. To substanitiate this recommendation, the author provides some facts. However, there are several questions needed to go through to determine the reliability of the recommendation.
First, it is questionable whether it is representative of the results from a poll of area residents. It is possible that the sample size is too small to support the whole picture so that the expected popularity is overestimate though 88 percent of samples are welcome the opening of a hobby shop in southeastern Grilldon. Moreover, it is unclear for the ages, gender and occupations of the samples, exacerbating the potential biased results. Without addressing this problem, the reliability of the recommendation cannot be determined.
Second, it is unclear whether the facts of Grilldon can be equally applied to southeastern Grilldon. Grilldon and southeastern Grilldon may have serious differences. For example, the increase of hobby business and the population of retirees in southeastern Grilldon are far less than Grilldon due to diffrent industry structure, making the analogy between them is very poor. Therefore, the reliability of the recommendation cannot be determined unless taking this question into consideration.
Third, even if southeastern Grilldon and Grilldon are sufficiently alike so that the facts of Grilldon can be equally applied to southeastern Grilldon, it is still problematic whether the popularity of the hobby shop in southeastern Grilldon will be actually huge. Given that the author only provides the rate of increase of the hobby business rather than the basis amount, it is possible that the potential market is very small even though it has increased by 300 percent. This possibility is increased provided that there are currently no hobby shops in southeastern Grilldon, otherwise there may be exist hobby shops to preoccupy market and make profits.
Forth, it is unclear whether the curent trend can be transmissed to the future. It is possible that there are big changes in the market and preference of consumers so that the current enthusiastic cannot be prolonged to the followings years. The authors does not provide any evidence to support the assuption that the enthusiasm about hobby shops will be unchanged. Therefore, the reliability of the recommendation and the predicted result cannot be determined unless addressing this issue.
To sum up, the the reliability of the recommendation and the predicted result cannot be evaluated only after taking several questions addressed as mentioned above.
- The following was written as a part of an application for a small business loan by a group of developersin the city of Monroe A jazz music club in Monroe would be a tremendously profitable enterprise Currently the nearest jazzclub is 65 miles away thu 78
- Some people want government to spend money on searching for life on other planets However others think it is a waste of public money when the earth has so many problems Discuss these two views and give your own opinion 73
- Some people believe positive thinking has benefits while others consider it has drawbacks Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 11
- Some people want government to spend money on searching for life on other planets However others think it is a waste of public money when the earth has so many problems Discuss these two views and give your own opinion 73
- Some people want government to spend money on searching for life on other planets However others think it is a waste of public money when the earth has so many problems Discuss these two views and give your own opinion 73
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 7 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 6 2
No. of Sentences: 19 15
No. of Words: 412 350
No. of Characters: 2198 1500
No. of Different Words: 184 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.505 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.335 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.102 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 167 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 139 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 101 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 68 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.684 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.603 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.684 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.356 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.586 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.104 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 6 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 255, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'do'.
Suggestion: do
...ed to the followings years. The authors does not provide any evidence to support the...
^^^^
Line 11, column 12, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...ss addressing this issue. To sum up, the the reliability of the recommendation and t...
^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 12, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...ss addressing this issue. To sum up, the the reliability of the recommendation and t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, still, therefore, third, thus, for example, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 19.6327345309 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.9520958084 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 28.8173652695 94% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 55.5748502994 83% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 16.3942115768 79% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2256.0 2260.96107784 100% => OK
No of words: 412.0 441.139720559 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47572815534 5.12650576532 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.56307096286 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17178685895 2.78398813304 114% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 204.123752495 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.45145631068 0.468620217663 96% => OK
syllable_count: 696.6 705.55239521 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.96107784431 181% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 19.7664670659 91% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.8473053892 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6624885486 57.8364921388 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.333333333 119.503703932 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8888888889 23.324526521 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.70786347227 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 6.88822355289 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165911864187 0.218282227539 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0558607921887 0.0743258471296 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622704109088 0.0701772020484 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0945820571898 0.128457276422 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0603361399898 0.0628817314937 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 14.3799401198 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.3550499002 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.197005988 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.5979740519 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.32208582834 103% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 98.500998004 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 12.3882235529 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.1389221557 97% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.9071856287 126% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.