Some people want government to spend money on searching for life on other planets. However, others think it is a waste of public money when the earth has so many problems.
Discuss these two views and give your own opinion.
There is a debate whether goverment should spend financial expenditure on serching for life in the universe, in which some individuals think it is a must while others argues that it is a waste instead.
On the one hand, it is reasonable to search for life on other planets. First, the intrinsic nature of human is the curiostity to the world, with which we have made tremoudous achievements. In the past time, the technology of increasing agricultural productivity was invented when we struggeld with hunger. We can expect there will be more and more scientific findings if we continue to make efforts to explore the universe. Second, only goverment have the ability to undertake the task of searching for life with the tax income given that it is impossible for companies to have the willingness to do it because of the bankruptcy risk.
On the other hand, there are some reasons why it is seen as a waste for some individuals. First, there are more realistic development issure which needs the urgent treatment of goverment. For example, a lot of people are struggling to improve their life standards given that the agricultural productivity there could only let them live and they do not have extra fund to acquire more material capital or human capital. Second, there will be a huge opportunity cost for the searching activity because of the limited resources of goverment, which is exacerbated if the activity is not successful. The searching activity may crowd out the potential expenditure on other project and slow down the pace of the constuction of the whole society.
From my perspective, I think the goverment should balance the problems between universe and reality to ensure the urgent developmet issues could be addressed at a priority.
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants Butter has now been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States Only about 2 percent of customers have complain 38
- Some people want government to spend money on searching for life on other planets However others think it is a waste of public money when the earth has so many problems Discuss these two views and give your own opinion 78
- The following appeared in a memo from New Ventures Consulting to the president of HobCo Inc a chain of hobby shops Our team has completed its research on suitable building sites for a new HobCo hobby Shop in the city of Grilldon We discovered that th 58
- Some people want government to spend money on searching for life on other planets However others think it is a waste of public money when the earth has so many problems Discuss these two views and give your own opinion 73
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this time period most of the complain 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 197, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...ve made tremoudous achievements. In the past time, the technology of increasing agricultu...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 599, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d if the activity is not successful. The searching activity may crowd out the pot...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, second, so, while, for example, i think, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01023890785 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87790426064 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539249146758 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7407166101 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.333333333 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4166666667 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18185018301 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0714203148254 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696663041541 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112430406679 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0515871896419 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.