Some people want the government to spend more money for looking life on other planets, however others think it is waste of public money when there are so many problems on earth that the government should be solving. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Thanks to the sprawling technologies today, humans are receiving a huge chance to broaden their horizons about everything on earth and even on universe. While many people appreciate this development, others show their objection to these activities that is supposed to waste time and cost.
On one hand, there is no doubt that humans on earth are struggling a number of problems needed to be solved as soon as possible. That can be issues relevant to climate change, malnourishment, unemployment, terrorism and so on. Governments and citizens have made ceaseless efforts to improve and prevent them from becoming worse. Therefore, it is clear that many people object to spend a mountain of money searching for another life without concentrating on issues mentioned above.
On the other hand, as a matter of course, humans have a strong ambition to get informed about everything existing. As a result, there are many modern inventions assisting people to find out miracles on another planet. This means not only exploiting something new plays a crucial role in human’s life but also give people a chance to research and invent more and more beneficial technologies.
In my point of view, I strongly believe that it is not a matter what if searching for another life or spending money solving urgent problems is more important. What we need to take into consideration is that if we are giving them a balance because both of them are indispensable to human growth.
In conclusion, concentrating on looking for life on other planets or dealing with hot issues depends much on government’s policies of specific countries. Whatever they decide, it will also bring certain benefits and drawbacks to citizens.
- Influence of human beings on the world's ecosystem is leading to the extinction of species and loss of biodiversity.What are the primary causes of loss of biodiversity?What solutions can you suggest? 67
- These days many families move to other countries for work Some people believe that the children in these families benefit from this move However others believe that it makes life more difficult for the children Discuss both these views and give your own o 95
- Many childhood diseases can now be prevented through the use of vaccines. Should parents be made by law to immunize their children against common diseases or should individuals have the right to choose not to immunize their children? 78
- Some people want the government to spend more money for looking life on other planets, however others think it is waste of public money when there are so many problems on earth that the government should be solving. Discuss both views and give your opinio 78
- Nowadays children play less with others and this has an impact on their development What are the reasons for this Does it have a good or a bad effect on children 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 245, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ain benefits and drawbacks to citizens.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, no doubt, of course, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1446.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18279569892 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99048477519 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616487455197 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.7249807252 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 111.230769231 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4615384615 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272682757199 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.079351188996 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549613644171 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130211823169 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304595596572 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.