Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think that is better to work for different organisations.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
However working for same employer for entire life has its own privileges, changing workplace from time to time carries some benefits. In the following lines, I will argue both point of views
Let’s start with the site I personally support. Being an employee for same entity enforce the sense of stability and loyalty. Both empower the clerk to do all his effort towards his company as he feels it is like his own property. Furthermore, that enriches his experience as regard his particular job. Thus, serving single organization for longer periods enhances the opportunities of the agents to be promoted on the levels salaries and positions.
On other hand, there are many drawbacks for this opinion. For instance, doing the same job every day shall lead to boring and subsequently lacking to innovation and creativity. Other disadvantage is creating what so called power centres and lobbying which create sort of unprofessional conflicts leading to distraction from the main purpose of the work.
Nonetheless, changing workplace seems to be enthusiastic and astonishing idea, it carries many risks and disadvantages. Had it been for changing working place, many wealthy businessmen would not have been had the essential experience to build their own fortunes. Moving from employer to another widens the experience not only by varying the training resources but also by exposing the worker to various managemental styles.
On the contrast to first point of view, changing work masters frequently dumps the employee chances in rapid job upgrading in addition to reduction in loyalty to corporate.
Finally, each opinion has its own supporters; pro-stability versus pro-change. Although I am pro-stability, I cannot deny the positive outcomes of the other act. The wise leadership can attract the employers to settle down in their entities as well, keep them innovated and enthusiastic about their functions.
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think that is better to work for different organisations.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 84
- Even though globalization affects the world’s economics in a very positive way, its negative side should not beforgotten. Discuss. 84
- the tables below 11
- Even though globalization affects the world’s economics in a very positive way, its negative side should not beforgotten. Discuss. 89
- Some people say that education system is the only critical factor to development of a country. To what extent doyou agree or disagree with this statement? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, nonetheless, so, thus, well, for instance, in addition, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1628.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40863787375 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96329126672 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654485049834 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4072022408 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.75 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8125 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275566845341 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746870751022 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662019703457 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130756899746 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0709424454429 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.