Some people work for the same organisations all their working life Others think that it is better to work for different organisations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion

Essay topics:

Some people work for the same organisations all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organisations.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

A better job is very pertinent to human existence. Few individuals prefer to render their services in a particular firm all through life. However, others opine that, it is preferably to move from one establishment to another. In my opinion, l believe that dedicating one's entire work-life in a company is more beneficial as one earns pension, various insurance, and other remuneration packages.

The benefits of spending one's entire life in a job cannot be overemphasize. Firstly, one earns pension and gratuity on retirement. this money can be used in setting up small scale businesses that will generate income to pay bills, household expenses and so on. Secondly, working in a particular office or job gives one the opportunity to perfect his or her skills, learn more, and become a guru in the field. The person can be hired as a consultant to educate other young professionals even at retirement. Finally, incentives and remuneration packages such as health insurance scheme for subsidising hospital bills for employees and their family members, car loans, and housing schemes. these can only be benefitted by one that has put in his or her services ten to twenty years for a particular company.

Many people still believe that moving from one establishment to another makes them meet new people, travel to different places, boost their curriculum vitae, and makes them learn different skills. this is really not a wonderful option because there are no savings for rainy days, poor financial growth, and in cases of accident no support as the are not regarded as permanent staff but only temporary employee of these organisations.

To sum up, working in companies can be exploitative and fun but the merits of being a permanent staff in an organisation is more rewarding and beneficial.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-08-09 Ja Han 56 view
2021-12-31 nishchayvaid93 87 view
2021-07-25 tanmeet 56 view
2021-06-02 Tristy 56 view
2021-05-04 parmii 67 view
Essays by user mimi08 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 268, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...n my opinion, l believe that dedicating ones entire work-life in a company is more b...
^^^^
Line 3, column 132, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...rns pension and gratuity on retirement. this money can be used in setting up small s...
^^^^
Line 3, column 688, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...embers, car loans, and housing schemes. these can only be benefitted by one that has ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 779, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... his or her services ten to twenty years for a particular company. Many people...
^^
Line 5, column 198, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
... and makes them learn different skills. this is really not a wonderful option becaus...
^^^^
Line 5, column 343, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... and in cases of accident no support as the are not regarded as permanent staff but onl...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, still, such as, in my opinion, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1506.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10508474576 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94455905662 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633898305085 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8182883718 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.571428571 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0714285714 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203911428594 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586745399323 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0392589571539 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11546234891 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0219982508655 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.