Some people work for the same organization all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organizations. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Some people spend their whole career working for an operation while others think working for more than one might be better. My comparison between the above views will be based on the benefits employees might receive.
Firstly, those never quitting their first job are less likely to improve their material benefits than those working for different organizations. The former ones have few chances, such as annual increments or when they are promoted, to get better salaries. Meanwhile, other employees may double or even triple theirs at any time by moving to bigger organizations ready to pay them higher base pay. Besides, the recent container carrier pays me the travel allowance, which I would not receive if I stayed with the previous one. Another reason that made me change my job is that the recent firm rewards us with its shares biannually while my former co-workers have not been informed of any similar plans.
Secondly, leaving jobs at least once might be more beneficial to workers’ spiritual life than keeping working merely one job. For example, some people resign from jobs at businesses to dedicate themselves to a non-government organization that they always desire to work for. Additionally, my sister has become much happier after she moved from a law firm whose colleagues often bullied her to the recent one whose every member is friendly with her. Furthermore, one of my friends’ friends’ talent in reporting news is only recognized and appreciated after leaving a local news agency for a national broadcaster.
In conclusion, comparing what people can receive if they work for only one organization or different ones, I hold that the latter can be more advantageous.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-25 | cinderel | 56 | view |
| 2023-03-05 | hahannguyen | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-24 | Nguyen Thi Thanh Xuan | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-24 | Lunar Tran | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-24 | Lunar Tran | 73 | view |
- Advertisements are becoming more and more common in our everyday life Is it a positive or negative development 11
- Some people think that job satisfaction is more important than job security. Others think that people cannot expect to enjoy a job and having a permanent job is more important. Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- Some people get into debt by buying things they don t need and can t afford What are the reasons for this behaviour What action can be taken to prevent people from having this problem 73
- Due to the development and rapid expansion of supermarkets many small local businesses are unable to compete Some people think that the closure of local business will bring about the death of local communities To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past thirty years that many cities in the world are now one big traffic jam How true do you think this statement is What measures can governments take to discourage people from using their cars 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 408, Rule ID: WHOSE_DT[5]
Message: Did you mean 'who's'?
Suggestion: who's
...ues often bullied her to the recent one whose every member is friendly with her. Furt...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, at least, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14079422383 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73995091126 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660649819495 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.3257693723 49.4020404114 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 118.666666667 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0833333333 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0833333333 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282358185526 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105695463087 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117634723683 0.0667982634062 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195341927439 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0650624461621 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.