Some people work for the same organization all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organizations.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
When a new job opportunity comes up, people can make a decision to either stay at their current job or apply for a new company. Whereas there are some benefits to accepting a new position in a different company, I would argue that it is better to continue to work at the same organization.
The option to work at a different organization is attractive for several reasons. Many people want to find a challenge in their job and salary. In this way, they will gain more experience and learn more skills related to their chosen profession. Everyone can apply to a new company with the expected salary in order to have a better life. When working for many companies, people will work in many different working environments. This is good for expanding social relationships.
On the other hand, I believe that it is more beneficial when people work for the same company all their working time. Firstly, some companies have seniority bonuses for long-term employees. People, who work for a long time in these companies, will achieve a higher position with a higher stable salary. For instance, some technology organizations require the employee to work at least 2 years to get to a Senior position, 5 years to get to Product Manager, and so on. Secondly, they gain familiarity with the working environment which makes them feel comfortable. This may lead to their happiness with their job and a successful career.
For those reasons mentioned above, it seems to me that people will get many expected results if they stay at the same organization for a long time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-25 | cinderel | 56 | view |
| 2023-03-05 | hahannguyen | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-24 | Nguyen Thi Thanh Xuan | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-24 | Lunar Tran | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-24 | Lunar Tran | 73 | view |
- Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing for example through cellphone tracking and security cameras In many cases the people being monitored are unaware that this is happening Do you think the advantages 61
- The pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below shows changes in three different areas of crime in manchester city centre from 2003 to 2012
- The chart below shows the expenditure on three categories among different age groups of residents in the UK in 2004 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 393, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...for many companies, people will work in many different working environments. This is good for ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, whereas, at least, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1297.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83955223881 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78569954676 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518656716418 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 412.2 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.1699022858 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.4666666667 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8666666667 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46666666667 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.414712793994 0.244688304435 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145021693224 0.084324248473 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105827083085 0.0667982634062 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251743360825 0.151304729494 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0855449239994 0.056905535591 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.