Some people work for the same organization all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organizations.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Many people have different opinions about workplaces where they intend to choose to bond in their life. While there is a school of thought that a significant number of citizens remain in the same company, I believe that there can be more merits to being involved in many groups.
There are many worthy reasons that workers contribute their values to the same organization, one of which is that those companies could fulfill their employees’ desires seeked in their career path. For example, employees are able to find dreamful conditions in one group, thus being willing to work and make remarkable contributions without thinking about changing in another one. Moreover, they will have more opportunities to get higher promotions, which seems to both enhance their ability to become professionals in their fields and provide an incentive to foster their well-rounded development.
However, it is also argued that working for different organizations can bring many advantages associated with new chances and knowledge that employees need to get during their life. There is no denying that workers will tend to look for another place that could make them more satisfied if they no longer find interests in their workplace, such as salary, working environment, and other similar things. Sometimes individuals are less likely to bond with a group which could be beneficial for them to feel safe or get a decent salary as they hardly enable them to learn new things particularly skills or expert knowledge.
In conclusion, I believe that working for many different groups can give employees more chances to learn new things and seek satisfying feelings. Of course, no one can deny the other reasons for working in the same one, in terms of meeting their demands in life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-25 | cinderel | 56 | view |
| 2023-03-05 | hahannguyen | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-24 | Nguyen Thi Thanh Xuan | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-24 | Lunar Tran | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-24 | Lunar Tran | 73 | view |
- In many countries household waste eg Food packing is increasing day by day What are the reasons How can this problem be solved 67
- Computers are often argued to be the most important invention of the last hundred years To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- Some people think that teachers should be responsible for teaching students to judge what is right and wrong so that they can behave well Others say that teachers should only teach students academic subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Plastic bags plastic bottles and plastic packaging are bad for the environment What damage does plastic do to the environment What can be done by governments and individuals to solve this problem 67
- A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs including uses for food and research Discu 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ated with new chances and knowledge that employees need to get during their life....
^^
Line 4, column 43, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
... conclusion, I believe that working for many different groups can give employees more chances ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, moreover, so, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, of course, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1484.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13494809689 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71333675276 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557093425606 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.8426906722 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.4 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.9 20.7667163134 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278815438152 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119593768833 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0704746899068 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175459605205 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0658713485735 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.07 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.