Some people work for the same organization all their working life. Others think it is better to work for different organizations.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
While a number of people intend to work in the same company for their entire life, others prefer switching their work. Despite the fact that both of these viewpoints have separated advantages, I do believe that the latter side would dominate the other one.
On the one hand, working permanently in the same organization creates a high reputation for him, as a result, gets a chance to be promoted to a higher position, which indirectly leads to a higher salary and a better remuneration. Moreover, his working style is also a highlight of his own lifestyle. Upbringing children, for instance, he ought to spend such an appreciable time picking up or preparing meals for youngsters, which working long-term in a corporation can meet the need.
On the other hand, a majority of youth prefer multi-experience in various offices. Switching helps him be more well-informed with the rapid change of technology, thus, can be termed as an all-rounder employee. What is more, altering a career means being more flexible to find the most reasonable workplace to service his own interest. For example, if a person has a Bachelor's in Language, then graduating from school and handing in CV in a science field maybe in light of the fact that of the wages, he definitely has a demand to try a new job.
To conclude, while a set of people want to be stable in the same corporation, others prefer experiencing various ones. Nevertheless, flexibility would be the top option due to a number of advantages mentioned above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-10 | monmon12345 | 73 | view |
- The pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in new Zealand in 2003 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some people get into debt by buying things they don t need and can t afford What are the reasons for this behavior What action can be taken to prevent people from having this problem 89
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and 2010 89
- Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing for example through cell phone tracking and security cameras In many cases the people being monitored are unaware that this is happening 84
- Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past thirty years that many cities in the world are now one big traffic jam How true do you think this statement is What measures can governments take to discourage people from using their cars 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ter side would dominate the other one. On the one hand, working permanently in ...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rm in a corporation can meet the need. On the other hand, a majority of youth p...
^^^
Line 5, column 365, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a bachelor' or simply 'Bachelors'?
Suggestion: a bachelor; Bachelors
... interest. For example, if a person has a Bachelors in Language, then graduating from schoo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...initely has a demand to try a new job. To conclude, while a set of people want ...
^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...number of advantages mentioned above.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, as a result, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1262.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9296875 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00356843435 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.62109375 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 395.1 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6945276678 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.727272727 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2727272727 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6363636364 7.06120827912 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289849916166 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0961772867843 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103454856983 0.0667982634062 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167304620986 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118590704819 0.056905535591 208% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.