Some say that news has no connection with most people's life and it is waste of time for most of us to read newspapers and watch television news programs. Do you agree or disagree?
In contemporary society, there is an ongoing debate regarding the relevance of news reported through various media platforms to people's daily lives. Some argue that reading newspapers and watching television news programs is a waste of time. However, I strongly disagree with this viewpoint.
There are compelling reasons why news reports should not be considered irrelevant to people's lives. Firstly, the majority of articles and documentaries are meticulously crafted based on information collected by diligent journalists and reporters. To ensure accuracy and avoid the spread of misinformation, these professionals must physically travel to the locations and gather comprehensive details on the subject matter. This rigorous process acts as a safeguard against the proliferation of fake news. For instance, in Vietnam, dedicated journalists often venture into remote areas plagued by poverty and hunger to report on the challenges faced by underdeveloped regions.
Moreover, consuming news through various media outlets can have significant benefits. By engaging with news programs or reading newspapers, individuals gain deeper insights into various aspects of life, enabling them to respond appropriately to current events. For instance, when natural disasters like floods strike central areas in Vietnam, immediate news reports on national TV channels are crucial. These reports raise awareness nationwide, prompting people to take action, such as mobilizing funds and providing aid to the affected regions and their inhabitants. Such collective efforts can potentially save a considerable number of lives.
In conclusion, it is evident that news reports conveyed through newspapers and TV programs play a crucial role in people's lives. They provide accurate information and foster awareness, prompting individuals to take meaningful action. Therefore, it would be unjustifiable to dismiss these news articles or reports as irrelevant. To stay informed and connected with the world around us, engaging with reputable news sources remains essential.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-06 | trikhung777 | 84 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | dákjd | 61 | view |
| 2023-06-15 | hieu13092006 | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-01 | Nguyễn Thị Thanh Thảo | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-29 | Nguyễn Thị Thanh Thảo | 78 | view |
- Most people are not interested in how their food has been produced They only care about how much it costs How true is this statement What influences people when they buy food 90
- In the future it is expected that the proportion of older people will be higher than that of young people in many developed countries What are the positive or negative effects of this development 78
- Some people believe men are competitive than women To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- In the future it is expected that the proportion of older people will be higher than that of young people in many developed countries What are the positive or negative effects of this development 11
- It should be more expensive to make sugary products less appealing to consumers in order to encourage them to consume less Many manufactured foods and drinks contain high levels of sugar which can cause many health problems Do you agree or disagree 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1767.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.92953020134 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06930333218 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644295302013 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.7523344222 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.941176471 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5294117647 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94117647059 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274335381442 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0881017090288 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106292377463 0.0667982634062 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181643353171 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0922817349559 0.056905535591 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.82 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.84 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.