Some schools have restricted the use of mobile phones Is this a positive development or a negative development

Essay topics:

Some schools have restricted the use of mobile phones. Is this a positive development or a negative development?

A phone is a useful device for our day to day life. Although its usage seems important in a school environment, some schools have decided to ban it. In the following writeup I will explain why I conceive restricting smartphone usage in schools as a positive development by giving two reasons to support my viewpoint..

First, restricting phones increases students' focus on the course and their learning. Their attention span is no longer splitted into their phone and the lessons. Research shows that it takes an average of 25 minutes to become focused on a subject after shifting attention to another topic. In a classroom where students are allowed to use their phone , instead of focusing on learning their lessons, they are distracted with a wide range of notifications coming from their devices such as emails, and social media notifications. This can have negative effects in the future because the student can keep this behaviour in their working environments and this can affect their productivity in future.
Phone usage should be restricted to prevent distractions in the classroom in order to prepare learners for their future careers.

Second, this restriction during recreational time will increase student social awareness. This will help them to build strong relationships with their mates. Instead of always scrolling on their phone during a face to face conversation, students will focus on the ongoing dialogue and consequently their relationship building skill will improve. This attitude will help them in their day to day lives because they will be more social and this can have a huge impact in their wellbeing and mental health.

To sum up , in the following write up I explained why banning phone usage in school is a positive development. I talked about which impact the ban can have on student concentration in class, and on their sociability at school and in life in general.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-11-01 Manjinder_kaur 84 view
2022-05-03 ChaitanyaYeole 78 view
2021-08-29 Mahima0202 73 view
2020-11-16 esp_py 73 view
2018-10-01 eyraen 73 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the following writeup I will explain why I conceive restricting smartphone usage ...
^^
Line 2, column 317, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...ving two reasons to support my viewpoint.. First, restricting phones increases...
^^
Line 4, column 351, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... students are allowed to use their phone , instead of focusing on learning their l...
^^
Line 4, column 405, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...focusing on learning their lessons, they are distracted with a wide range of noti...
^^
Line 4, column 689, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... and this can affect their productivity in future. Phone usage should be restricted to ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 107, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...assroom in order to prepare learners for their future careers. Second, this r...
^^
Line 7, column 210, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...always scrolling on their phone during a face to face conversation, students will...
^^
Line 10, column 10, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...being and mental health. To sum up , in the following write up I explained w...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, second, so, well, in general, such as, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14423076923 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85993822006 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551282051282 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8235107376 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.86666666667 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246228198779 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0842463207184 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488987383181 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140438125059 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0773575946989 0.056905535591 136% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.