Space travel has been possible for some time and some people believe that space tourism could be developed in the future Do you think it is a positive or negative development

Thanks to the development of technology and science, it is understanable why some people predict that space tourism could become common in the future. Although this can bring certain benefits, I believe that these are far outweighed by many drawbacks of this kind of tourism.
Admittedly, space travel can bring some slight benefits. One of them is that doing so allows people to experience new spaces so they can enhance their knowledge about other planets, or even other civilizations outside the Earth. Another is that space tourism could greatly contribute to the advancement of space science, and humans could prepare for new places to live in the future. This is because overpopulation and polluted environments are threatening issues, which governments have to face, so exploring the space is beneficial in the long-term.
However, the disadvantages of traveling space are more significant in terms of environment and economic. Regard the former, to operate a spaceship consumes the large amount of fossil fuel, which releases exhaust emissions into the surroundings. In addition, before a spaceship is used to go to the space, scientists have to conduct huge experiments. This is harmful to the environment because this process not waste a lot of energy, but it also dispose of waste from broken spaceship, and these waste takes a lot of time to decompose. With regard to the latter, expenditure on space tourism costs a huge amount of money, while it could be used for other urgent fields such as education or healthcare system.
In conclusion, while there may be some advantages in the long-term, these are far eclipsed by the disadvantages in terms of environment and economic for the aforementioned arguments, I contend that this is a negative development.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 446, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'disposes'?
Suggestion: disposes
... not waste a lot of energy, but it also dispose of waste from broken spaceship, and the...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as, with regard to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1488.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2027972028 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02279147909 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559440559441 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1235305708 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30295644782 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109097802214 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0827851498059 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173967650856 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573705367049 0.056905535591 101% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.