In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.
Why is this the case? What can be done about this problem?
Recent years have witnessed tremendous developments in the agricultural sector, yet millions of people continue to suffer and even die from hunger. In my view, there exist some main reasons to this phenomenon, which could be addressed by a number of appropriate remedies.
When it comes to world hunger, many causes contribute to this grave problem. Climate change is likely to reduce global food potential and production, thereby increasing the risk of hunger, especially in marginalized economies. As extreme rainfall, prolonged droughts, and natural disasters become more frequent and capricious, farmers are becoming more vulnerable to climate change, hence many calamitous consequences in many regions in the world. Besides, these fluctuations in weather system lead to food volatility, which results in malnutrition. Another indispensable fact is that not all of the food produced is consumed. Food production also uses up precious natural resources; therefore, this wastage represents a missed opportunity to improve global food security.
There are several actions that governments could perform to alleviate the foregoing problems. First, early warning systems for extreme weather should be improved so that farmers have enough time to prepare for those events and take necessary actions to save their crops. Secondly, more experienced scientists and experts in the field of agriculture should be sent to regions frequently suffering from climate change so that they can do more researches and find the most effective methods to improve food production in these areas. Finally, governments and large organisations should raise humanitarian funds focused on food aid to support people who have difficulty.
In conclusion, although it is obvious that productivity in agriculture has improved owing to technology advances, numerous people are still deprived of the food necessity. However, governments must take responsibility for implementing measures to enhance the life quality for the poor and reduce the poverty rate.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-20 | Pirate7 | 89 | view |
| 2019-09-28 | jin96 | 11 | view |
| 2019-09-05 | Bunheehee98 | 89 | view |
| 2019-03-02 | hur hyeon bin | 50 | view |
- The availability of entertainment such as video games on handheld devices are harmful to individual and to the society they live in To what extent do you agree and disagree 89
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 84
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters such as food clothes and entertainment is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes Other people believe that it is important 84
- Accidents are common on roads. What are the causes of this problem? Can you speculate the effects of this phenomenon? How could the frequency of accidents be reduced? 89
- Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects. Other people think that, in today’s world, subjects like Science and Technology are more important than History.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 590, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... Another indispensable fact is that not all of the food produced is consumed. Food product...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, in conclusion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1735.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72607260726 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00671115207 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640264026403 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0120393669 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.928571429 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6428571429 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120213719598 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0410271918893 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523619846753 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0673183220728 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027912498898 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.25 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.