In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.
why is this the case?
what can be done about this problem?
In recent years, the amount of food production has increased rapidly, but we are still witnessing malnutrition in various parts of the world. In my opinion, It seems somehow paradoxical that unlike having adequate food resources, numerous individuals are coping with hungry.
There are several reasons behind this issue, but one of them is the most influential one. Unsuitable distribution model has a profound effect on food supply chain. Lack of advanced facilities causes a significant amount of foods to get destroyed in the delivering process. For example, In some african countries which need to supply foods from abroad, the importing process might take too long, and during this time, a significant amount of perishable foods will be changed to nothing, but waste. Moreover, because of some political conditions, some countries become deprived of receiving food from other countries. One of these political barriers are sanctions which probably are considered to have an effect on governments, but actually will influence on people's life.
In this regard, It seems to me that despite the existence of these obstacles, there are some reasonable solutions which can be followed to address such problems. The most solution is helping poor countries through financial support. This solution would be beneficial to them in two separate aspects. Firstly, it helps them to produce their own food from their lands, and secondly, this improve the employment condition in poor countries. Also, developed countries can create an effective supply model to avoid food loss. For example, the invention of new containers with effective cooling system could help food preservation in the delivering period. Besides these, we can export semi-prepared meals to poor countries. These kinds of foods could provide vital vitamins for people with malnutrition problems.
In conclusion, a wide range of nations are exposed to hunger nowadays, and on the other side, a huge amount of foods are wasted. However, I believe that several measures can be done to relieve this problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | aghasaeed | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | geforce | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | Noah1997 | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | yasinyucesan | 95 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | choco_fans | 11 | view |
- As most people spend a major part of their adult life at work, job satisfaction is an important element of individual wellbeing. What factors contribute to job satisfaction?How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all workers? 67
- As most people spend a major part of their adult life at work, job satisfaction is an important element of individual wellbeing. What factors contribute to job satisfaction?How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all workers? 67
- As most people spend major part of their adult life at work, job satisfaction is an important element of individual wellbeing. What factors contribute to job satisfaction? How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all workers? 67
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.why is this the case?what can be done about this problem? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1754.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39692307692 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78406964478 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578461538462 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.809619238477 865% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5274255563 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4444444444 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0555555556 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72222222222 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14769756185 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0503037505027 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601382930487 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0977876793157 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372617541828 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.