In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.
Why is this the case?
What can be done about this problem?
Humans are making rapid advancements in every aspect of civilization including agriculture. However, despite these developments in the agricultural field many people around the world face the problem of starvation. This essay shall try to explain why is it so and what can we do about this.
Firstly, the agriculture in a country or region is driven by its topology. This includes the factors like soil composition, water retention qualities of soil, rainfall, climatic changes and so on. So even when scientists and researchers around the globe come up with improvements in farming technologies, those methods may not be applicable in certain regions. Hence leading the poor yield and forcing people to buy expensive imported food.
The above case leads to the second problem which is the economical issue. When a country is unable to enough food for its inhabitants, it has to import basic necessities like grains, fruits and vegetables. As in a region of low farming the economy won't thrive, people won't earn much. Therefore, they are unable to purchase the already expensive imported products.
The collective solution to the above situations lies in the globalization of farming resources. Different governments should collaborate over an area to pool their resources and to provide agricultural goods to the entire combined region. Each country should grow what it grows best and then distribute it to the set region at regular prices.
To sum up, it can be said that the problem of food shortages still persist around the world. However, with thoughtful use of agricultural resources it can be tackled to some extent.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | aghasaeed | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | geforce | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | Noah1997 | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | yasinyucesan | 95 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | choco_fans | 11 | view |
- The mass media, including television, radio and newspaper, have great influence in shaping people's ideas. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer. 78
- SuperCorp recently moved its headquarters to Corporateville. The recent surge in the number of homeowners in Corporateville proves that Corporateville is a superior place to live than Middlesburg, the home of SuperCorp's original headquarters. Moreov 23
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 89
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society.To what extent do you agree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 362, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...y not be applicable in certain regions. Hence leading the poor yield and forcing peop...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 153, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...d for its inhabitants, it has to import basic necessities like grains, fruits and vegetables. As ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, second, so, still, then, therefore, as to, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1382.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25475285171 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91838904319 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642585551331 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.6709550588 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.375 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4375 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257282252938 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687462396262 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0822775341702 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138634992689 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123598541772 0.056905535591 217% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.