The spread of multinational companies and the resulting increase of globalization produce positive effects to everyone. Do you agree or disagree
Globalization has created a beneficial impact on both developed and developing nations. However, when the term 'globalization' was introduced in modern era, it received criticism from the economist all over the world. Personally, i agree to the fact that globalization has brought about positive changes in society.
Firstly, globalization has opened the door of opportunities for people and nations over the world. Establishment of multinational companies increased job openings in not so developed countries resulting in development of the people's lifestyle. Also, it has drastically revolutionized the infrastructure and transportation in such areas. Moreover, local companies also tend to earn huge profits my selling raw materials and marketing their products on global basis through foreign companies. On top of that, even state gets a huge amount of money as tax and legal fees from these agencies.
Nevertheless, it also has certain drawbacks. Multinational establishments focus on production and monetization regardless of the harm that is caused to the local environment and companies. Emergence of multinational companies increases the competition in market which might lead to closure of certain decades old regional enterprises.
Also, in some cases these so called companies are more more powerful in terms of finance and influence, this could result in controlling the entire sources of country. This eventually creates monopoly and unfair trade practices.
In conclusion, Globalisation provides lot of good effects if we think in wider terms, but we can not generalize this effects as positive to everyone. Just like every system it also has some negative effects. So the governments should keep an eye on everything when they open their economy to world market.
- The process below shows how to make dough for a pizza Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows what percentage of their daily intake of various nutrients the average person in USA consumes in each meal and in snacks These nutrients may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting main fea 67
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Some people think it s fine for professional sportsmen to misbehave on or off the field as long as they are playing well Do you agree or disagree with the statement 73
- We all work or will work in our jobs with many different kinds of people In your opinion what are some important characteristics of a co worker someone you work closely with Use reasons and specific examples to explain why these characteristics are import 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ation has created a beneficial impact on both developed and developing nations. H...
^^
Line 2, column 230, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...onomist all over the world. Personally, i agree to the fact that globalization ha...
^
Line 4, column 226, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...untries resulting in development of the peoples lifestyle. Also, it has drastically rev...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 51, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: more
...ome cases these so called companies are more more powerful in terms of finance and influe...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 51, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'more' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: more
...ome cases these so called companies are more more powerful in terms of finance and influe...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, in conclusion, in some cases, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1519.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62592592593 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27634620339 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659259259259 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.6586875788 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9375 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.875 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193318241715 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516570672805 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537261200151 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0928549347558 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291673440784 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.