Students should be taught academic knowledge so that they can pass exams, and skills such as cooking or dressing should not be taught. To what extent do you agree/disagree?
Whether skills such as cooking or dressing should be added to the schools’ curriculum or not remains a question of intense debate. While some people claim that these skills can prepare students for their life ahead, I believe that students should be taught academic subjects only for a number of reasons.
It is evident that academic knowledge can prepare students for a better career. Those who master academic knowledge are usually more likely to pass examinations and gain essential qualifications, increasing their job prospects. In addition, academic knowledge is undeniably a prerequisite for entering some of the great guilds such as medicine, law and academia, which can provide secure and lucrative jobs. Blue-collar workers and school dropouts, on the other hand, usually have to cope with a life of cash-strapped insecurity and face the risks of losing their jobs at any time.
More importantly, teaching students academic subjects can make contributions to society. There’s no doubt that subjects such as Maths and Science are extremely helpful for society. For example, teaching science is useful because it can lead to the discovery of new medicines and vaccinations. These vaccinations can help to inoculate people against diseases, boosting public health and enhancing the quality of life.
Proponents of teaching practical skills base their claim on the fact that academic qualifications are no longer the only route for success, and that practical skills should be taught to students at school. While this is true to some extent, it must be remembered that students still have many opportunities to learn practical skills such as cooking or dressing outside the school environment. For instance, they can learn these from their mothers, who usually take responsibility for handling domestic chores and therefore have much more experience and advice to pass on their children rather than teachers at school. Hence, practical skills should not be taught cooking or dressing at schools.
To conclude, only academic subjects should be taught to students, and practical skills should be eliminated from the schools’ curriculum. Academic knowledge can not only ensure students’ a brighter and more secure future but also contribute to the development of society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-13 | hieu13092006 | 84 | view |
| 2022-02-23 | Hai Anh Phan Thi | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-12 | Trangdodo | 89 | view |
| 2021-04-03 | supermanminh512 | 61 | view |
| 2020-10-03 | Nguyen Hung | 56 | view |
- Some people say that it is possible for a country to be both economically successful and have a clean environment Others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion
- Write a paragraph of about 150 words to answer the following question What skills do students need to learn to prepare for their future careers 56
- Ways to promote creativity at school 89
- It is said that people who read books for pleasure have better imagination and language skills than people who watch TV Do you agree or disagree 84
- With the pressure on today s young people to succeed academically some people believe that non academic subjects at school e g physical education and cookery should be removed from the syllabus so that children can concentrate wholly on academic subjects 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 303, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... undeniably a prerequisite for entering some of the great guilds such as medicine, law and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, still, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, no doubt, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1942.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47042253521 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87410094789 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507042253521 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 589.5 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.060992882 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.375 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1875 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9375 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.371732794414 0.244688304435 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140094737557 0.084324248473 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1097756619 0.0667982634062 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233720396091 0.151304729494 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112566572475 0.056905535591 198% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.