Studies have suggested that children watch much more television than they did in the past and spend less time on active or creative things.
What are the reasons and what measures should be taken to encourage children to spend more time on active or creative things
According to studies, kids tend to watch far more television than they used to, but spend a lesser amount of time doing creative or active activities. To address this problem, the essay below will explain the cause and offer feasible solutions.
A number of factors are responsible for this trend. The first reason is due to the widespread use of online TV streaming, which has fully met children's needs. For example, YouTube Kids has created a more contained environment for young children and satisfied their active fantasy lives. Each TV channel provides high-quality images or vibrant visuals that match children's interests. This enjoyment also comes from the purpose behind it. Nowadays, the younger generation is under a plethora of strain. Living in a fast-paced urban lifestyle has remarkably affected those little ones. With a heavily scheduled life, many modern kids are always on the go and mostly spend time alone. Screen time is their way to be free from real-life control. That's why they take fewer looks at other activities.
Becoming a heavy viewer is the root cause of any related health problems; consequently, here are some measurements that can be taken into consideration. To begin with, state bureaucrats should propagate summer camps or charity organizations. It will give children a chance to directly experience everyday life rather than spend the whole day on a TV screen. In addition, parents play a vital role in the process. They must understand that not everyone ought to be perfect; merely let kids be kids. That means children should be encouraged to spend time on some active things instead, namely sports, cooking, and reading. Both indoor and outdoor activities are included.
To sum up, I firmly believe that there could be further reasons behind the habit of watching television and ways to help tackle this problem. However, whether it is effective or not depends on the intervention of both the government and parents.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-20 | an@123 | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | Ng Minh Chau | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | cassiexo | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | cassiexo | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-17 | Nguyenx Trần Minh Trí | view |
- The pictures demonstrate the transformation of the Colwick Arts Centre between 2005 and now There are some noticeable changes were made in buildings including sizes locations and recreation facilities
- Studies have suggested that children watch much more television than they did in the past and spend less time on active or creative things What are the reasons and what measures should be taken to encourage children to spend more time on active or creativ 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 741, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
... way to be free from real-life control. Thats why they take fewer looks at other acti...
^^^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the government and parents.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, look, so, for example, in addition, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1655.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.171875 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69905763358 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.66875 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.8661133372 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.8095238095 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2380952381 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323036721702 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0684731380789 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0857797231827 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173624267613 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0737523597568 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.11 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.