Studies have suggested that children watch much more television than they did in the past and spend less time on active or creative things. What are the reasons and what measures should be taken to encourage children to spend more time on active or creative things?
In recent years, limited participation in physical activities and creativity by children non-stop engaging in television has never failed to draw public attention and spark controversies. In this essay, the reasons behind this phenomenon will be discussed, along with potential solutions to it.
There are two elements that contribute to children being addicted to television. The first one is the lack of parental guidance and limits on screen time. This is due to the fact that parents have failed to recognized the negative impact of excessive television consumption. As a result, children may end up feeling exhausted which is caused by spending hours in front of the television, and neglect other activities such as sports, home assignment, and socializing with friends.
Furthermore, another reason that should be taken into account is the availability of all-day broadcasting programs with addictive content, such as colorful animated movies, or attention-grabbing advertisements. This is exemplified by program creator targeting children due to their unlimited interests and tender personalities, which greatly contributes to a significant increase in television viewership. Consequently, children may stop other activities in favor of watching television.
Two solutions of great practicality are suggested to alleviate the situation. To begin with, parents should play an active role in managing their children’s television consumption. To be more specific, parents can set limits on screen time, monitor contents that their children may encounter, and encourage them to participate in other activities that promote healthy development. By taking these steps, parents can help their children avoid the negative consequences of excessive television consumption.
In conclusion, the lack of parents' attention and all-day broadcasting programs with addictive content are the key reasons that account for the problem. With the solutions mentioned above, there are a number of ways that could be done to counteract the situation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-20 | an@123 | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | Ng Minh Chau | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | cassiexo | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | cassiexo | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-17 | Nguyenx Trần Minh Trí | view |
- The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed 73
- The bar chart shows the information of the number of volunteers and paid workers in 4 different roles in the sports sector of an Australian town in 2015 67
- The maps below show the layouts of the nature Museum between 2010 and 2013 67
- Many students find it difficult to concentrate or pay attention at school What are the reasons What could be done to solve this problem 78
- Many students find it difficult to concentrate or pay attention at school What are the reasons What could be done to solve this problem 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, may, so, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1741.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.80333333333 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24963416744 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566666666667 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5955195109 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.066666667 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246566293772 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0801188095864 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497368192598 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129737862275 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562345925841 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.36 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.