Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person.
Why do you think this is the case?
What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Some surveys indicate that there has been an alarming increase in the number of youngsters who would rather choose for meetings through some indirect forms than being on in-person dating. This phenomenon might bring back drawbacks to those objects for some reasons that requires both the governments and societies to have proper strategies to prevent.
It is obvious that in some cases, teenagers might have to face some problems which can occur if they lack contact with people in reality. Firstly, it is because socializing online might easily lead to the state of being unconfident in front of the crowd of young people which can create hardships for them in communication. After a long time being dependent on meeting onlines, which have the tools to hide faces and appearance or filter their users, it might be difficult for juveniles to be active in each reality conversation. Secondly, there are also potential risks in the online networks likes sexual harassment, stealing personal information. If young people do not have consciousness when making new friends and chatting online, they can put themselves into danger. According to some research, there have been more than thousands victims in the age of adolescence from European countries, and apps like Snapchat, Tik Tok are usually the best choices for the offenders. Besides, a child can also have some physical vulnerabilities like backache, near-sightedness if he does not have a good control on his timetable for using internet devices to meet and socialize.
To reach a betterment in society, it is necessary for governments and parents to show their important role in educating the future generation. Governments should encourage teenagers to participate in outdoor activities through increasing attractive and helpful competitions for them. They can also invest in some projects to boost youngsters’ attention to improve their skills in reality and be the place to unite them. Furthermore, parents have to take responsibility for managing and enduring their children. They have to raise their children about the benefits of communicating face-to-face and knowing how to balance their relationships.
In conclusion, favoring chatting online in young people can pose a big threat to the youth’ health and safety and also to society development if the adults do not take actions immediately.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1994.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 373.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34584450402 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98151048916 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595174262735 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 613.8 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2840422873 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.933333333 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8666666667 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53333333333 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0995257587268 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0353139117451 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0283407166537 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0592797526196 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0274808302178 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.