Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person.
Why do you think this is the case?
What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person?
In the era of cutting edge technology, living conditions have been improved in every aspect of life, including the way people communicate these days. Indeed, today, students have a tendency to maintain connection with people through online platforms instead of meeting face-to-face. This essay will shed light on several problems related to this topic as well as potential solutions to tackle this issue.
One major ground behind the rising trend of online communication among teenagers is that they get approach to portable devices in an early age. Thanks to advanced technology, today not only adults but also students are likely to get instant access to social media platforms through smart devices such as smartphones, even owing them without strict supervisor. As a result, they are easily to be addicted and excessive use it, leading to devoting themselves in virtual reality, totally ignoring real life. They are destined for maintaining interaction through the Internet as a substitution for having daily conversations. In addition, due to being severely impacted by the consequence of covid-19 pandemic, the youth has mostly transferred into keeping in touch with their social relationships based on online platforms such as Google meet, Zoom, or popular social media channels for both working and living to save time.
Actions should be taken into consideration as soon as possible to minimize detrimental effects of this trend. The first solution is that the government should invest money in enhancing community facilities such as sports centers, parks, playground to encourage teenagers to engage themselves in social activities. Additionally, the authorities should also collaborate with non-organizations to launch various campaign in multi-platforms to raise children's awareness as well as introduce social activities to them. To give an example, if the government runs ads on Facebook, they might perform as inforgraphic or short review through KOLs which can grab children's attention. Furthermore, educators should intergrate rigid lessons into extra activities or incentivize students to work in groups. Therefore, children will have more opportunities to have direct conversations with other people.
In conclusion, heavily relying on groundbreaking devices and being impacted by the pandemic are the two primary reasons lying behind the rising insufficiency of having face-to-face communication among youngsters. However, the government, educators, and parents can join hands to share burdens so that they can encourage children to partake themselves in social activities and having discussions with people.
- Topic Some people believe that a crime is a result of social problems and poverty others think that crime is a result of bad person s nature Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The only way to improve safety on our roads is to give much stricter punishments for driving offences To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car 56
- Many animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in the sea What are the reasons and solutions 89
- Today many children spend a lot of time playing computer games and little time on sports Why Is it a positive or negative development 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, well, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 41.998997996 157% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2245.0 1615.20841683 139% => OK
No of words: 393.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71246819338 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09363696068 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 176.041082164 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620865139949 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 689.4 506.74238477 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6634239574 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.3125 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5625 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8125 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.098581843213 0.244688304435 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0310083658836 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0307262280569 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.057089242022 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0227751339782 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.