Studying foreign language
Foreign language has always been one of the most important steps in the educational life of each person. Some trainers express that primary centres are not a suitable place for learning another language, whereas the others insist on teaching it from the beginning.
We have often been persuaded to learn a new language because of interacting with other nations. English language as an international one is the first priority in the schools. For example, we have to speak with a common language for finding a new job out of our country or studying abroad.
I completely agree with training the students from the primary schools. I believe that they have a fresh memory at this age, and they are really e enthusiastic about learning new things. If they are trained in a good way, they will never forget whatever have seen or listened. Some simple and creative methods such as photographic books and painting based courses will stimulate them to learn more and better. Another reason is that for the sake of studying a new language at primary school, students will be more passionate to continue it at secondary schools. It has a significant impact on their efficiency in the future. As an instance, the English language can be presented in an upper level to the volunteers, who have a background of it from primary years.
On the other hand, there is another idea to start this process from elementary schools. Actually, I think that there is not a reasonable matching between contents of more difficult lessons in secondary school and studying a new language. Certainly, learning a new language from secondary school is too late, because students face more complicated lessons and might not have enough interest in encountering with foreign books. The other reason is that at secondary schools, students have fewer times rather than the primary stage. These two educational levels have two or three years difference from each other in the majority of the countries. So, I believe that this is a relatively short time to make the learners ready for high schools and achieve appropriate results in a new type of language.
In brief, I can hardly find some disadvantages in learning a new language and do not consider any time limitation for it. Therefore, I believe that its advantages from the time of joining the schools outweigh the disadvantages. So, it's better we make a procedure and possibility for it from the primitive years of studying.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 7, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... primitive years of studying.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, if, really, second, so, therefore, thus, whereas, for example, i think, in brief, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2056.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 413.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97820823245 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75763221042 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498789346247 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 642.6 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.3332609639 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9047619048 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95238095238 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187178335062 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545044474716 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0697732436131 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115068324648 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0528394380977 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.