Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is evident that studying preferences differ from person to person. Although online schooling at home provides many conveniences, I believe it is far more beneficial for students if studying is carried in groups.
On the one hand, students opt for learning online within the comfort zone of the home is widespread nowadays given the advancement of technology and internet speed. First, they can keep the pace of studying without falling behind with the aid of online learning applications. For example, students can use specially designed online-learning apps on their phones or laptops to carry out daily learning materials and get real-time feedback from teachers upon after online examinations. Second, many introvert students consider homeschooling a profound advantage for them to advance in academic performance as they have difficulty communicating face-to-face with others. Furthermore, online-home schooling work wonders for students when there is a threat of contracting a kind of respiratory virus arising from in-person meetings that endangers the lives of millions of people.
On the other hand, studying in groups has long been the best way of learning as it provides a myriad of advantages supported by many academics across the world. When assigned to pair with one another, students are more likely to succeed in academic performance as grand ideas and information are constantly exchanged between students. Also, many studies suggest groups working in class may help promote creativity and social networks between students, which online-home learning often lacks. The presence of teachers is of the essence for the improvement of students in academic endeavours as they can instantly help students keep track of the learning process and make amend when mistakes occur. Furthermore, I believe the diversity and distinctive elements of the in-class environment are critical in helping slow learners improve their learning outcomes and highly developed students better their earned knowledge and perspectives.
In conclusion, though studying online at home offers a wide range of merits, collective studying would work best in promoting the holistic development of students overall.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-17 | nhub2409785 | 56 | view |
| 2023-12-30 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-08 | hinhin411 | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | hunghoang | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-07 | quoctoan@ | 78 | view |
- In some countries some criminal trials in law courts are shown on television so that the general public can watch them Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Write an essay about Some people think that all college students should study whatever they like Others believe they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both of 84
- More people put their personal information online e q address telephone number for everyday activities such as socializing on social networks or banking purposes is this positive or negative development 79
- Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents Others however believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 67
- Environmental problems are too big for individual countries and individual person to address In other words we have reached the stage where the only way to protect the environment is at an international level To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, may, second, so, for example, in conclusion, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1878.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63963963964 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98548947103 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591591591592 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.2865681529 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.461538462 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6153846154 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76923076923 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298589891677 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112605219059 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571415683716 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196836165206 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0153104601875 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, may, second, so, for example, in conclusion, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1878.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63963963964 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98548947103 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591591591592 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.2865681529 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.461538462 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6153846154 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76923076923 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298589891677 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112605219059 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571415683716 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196836165206 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0153104601875 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.