Subjects and lesson contents are decided by authorities, such as the government. Some people argue that teachers should make the choice.Do you agree or disagree?
An education system can play a key role in broadening children’s horizons and shaping their bright future. It is sometimes argued that the contents of books and syllabuses in the system should be determined by instructors instead of governments.
Teachers and professor as well-qualified persons who not only allocate a considerable amount of time to broaden their horizons and expand their knowledge about children’ needs and characteristic, but also are in direct communication with them, so instructors are more deserving of planning the school curriculum than governments. However, it can be noted that educators do not have enough knowledge about the requirements of society which has meant that they have been trying to improve the quality of books' contents in order to attract the attention of student to get a good mark; therefor, impractical materials’ book could create serious problems for pupils in the next future such as unemployment and other social issues.
It could be beneficial for children if subjects and lessons’ content is determined by governments. This is because book’s materials would be similar among all schools. Standardization helps both affluent and deprived students to follow a unique method and content during their studies, so the majority of them never feel inferior. Similarly, in many countries schools are appraised to compare and rank based on some similar indicators at the end of each academic year. Having the same criteria to evaluate educational system could help pupils to awareness about their strengths and weaknesses and also pedagogical institutes consider a plan in order to improve their efficiency.
In sum, numerous skilled tutors are in close contact with their students and know the abilities of their pupils well; as a result, teachers could prepare a beneficial school curriculum, but it would be fair if all of school-goers enjoy a standard method of teaching regardless of the areas which they live and social status.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-10 | Nguyễn Minhh Thư | 92 | view |
| 2018-11-05 | sahar22 | 78 | view |
- In the modern world, it is no longer necessary to use animals for food, clothing and medicine. To what extend do you agree or disagree. Give your reason and example. 78
- Subjects and lesson contents are decided by authorities such as the government Some people argue that teachers should make the choice Do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think that teachers should be responsible for teaching students to judge what is right and wrong so that they can behave well. Others say that teachers should only teach students academic subjects. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 67
Comments
How I can write my essay and
How I can write my essay and send for checking
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...by instructors instead of governments. Teachers and professor as well-qualified...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, similarly, so, well, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1704.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44408945687 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11579739523 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607028753994 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 107.759407942 49.4020404114 218% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 170.4 106.682146367 160% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.3 20.7667163134 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0830996688578 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0386822760549 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427534950436 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0518725732428 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0202691153077 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.8 13.0946893788 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.55 50.2224549098 63% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.